Remove category supreme-court
article thumbnail

The Latest in the Mountain Valley Pipeline Case

Legal Planet

The Fourth Circuit quickly halted it again but was overturned earlier today by the Supreme Court. But this time I think the Court got it right. The most debatable part of the 2023 law eliminated the jurisdiction of the courts to hear any challenge to the MVP. Congress recently gave the pipeline the go-ahead.

Law 189
article thumbnail

What Next for the Climate Tort Cases?

Legal Planet

With the Supreme Court’s refusal to take up the issue, the lawsuits against the oil industry are heading back to state court. Does a state court have jurisdiction to hear claims against out-of-state oil companies ? The Constitution limits a state court’s authority to cases that have “minimum contacts” with the state.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Catch 22 at the Supreme Court

Legal Planet

I want to focus on the disingenuous way the Supreme Court deals with a previous ruling, and its implications for states. Section 111 of the Act directs the EPA Administrator to list “categories of stationary sources” that “in [her] judgment. EPA , the Supreme Court said this: The dissent also cites our decision in American Elec.

article thumbnail

The Illusions of Takings Law

Legal Planet

For the last century, the Supreme Court has tried to operationalize the idea that a government regulation can be so burdensome that it amounts to a seizure of property. No, that’s not quite the language the Court used.) The Court’s ruling seems simple enough: Physical invasions of property are per se takings.

Law 163
article thumbnail

Post-Sackett Wetland Delineation Process Raises Questions

Ohio Environmental Law

Supreme Court in Sackett v. See, prior post discussing Sackett) The Court limited federal jurisdiction to only wetlands that are adjacent to navigable waters and those with a continuous surface connection to relatively permanent waters adjoining navigable waters. (See, Following the Supreme Court’s decision in SWANCC v.

article thumbnail

Cities, counties, and states score major procedural win in climate liability suits against fossil fuel companies

Law Columbia

Supreme Court declined to hear a petition on whether the climate liability cases should be heard in state or federal court. As a result, 11 cases will be remanded to state court to move towards motions to dismiss, discovery, and trial. Several factors led to the Supreme Court’s decision.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court Denies Review of And Depublishes Second District Refinery Project Case Addressing CEQA Baseline Issues

CEQA Developments

Falling more into the category of “spring cleaning” than “breaking news,” readers should note that a Second District decision, published last spring and covered in this blog, was ordered depublished by the California Supreme Court late last summer. 5th 588; my April 21, 2020 post on the case can be found here.

2020 73