Remove 2007 Remove Air Pollution Remove Politics
article thumbnail

Good & Bad Environmental News From the U.S. Supreme Court

Legal Planet

EPA, brought by a group of conservative/red states who challenge EPA’s approval of California’s request to adopt air pollution emission limits for motor vehicles more stringent than those issued by EPA. Supreme Court acted this week, the latest chapter in this longstanding legal and political saga.

article thumbnail

The Endangerment Finding Is in Danger. Will EPA’s Zeldin Uphold Climate Science?

Union of Concerned Scientists

Back in 2007, the Supreme Court reached a landmark judgment in Massachusetts et al. establishing that heat-trapping emissions (or greenhouse gas emissions) are air pollutants covered by the Clean Air Act. This blatant attempt to do an end-run around scientific evidence deserves to fail. What is the Endangerment Finding?

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Why Repeal the Endangerment Finding?

Legal Planet

Second, repealing the endangerment finding allows EPA to avoid replacing all the Biden Administration climate rules that were issued under the Clean Air Act after it rescinds them. EPA , decided in 2007, had two important findings. Massachusetts v.

article thumbnail

New Analysis Shows Truck Manufacturers’ Scare Tactic Just a Bunch of Hot Air

Union of Concerned Scientists

Primarily, these have focused on the 2007 EPA regulations, which were the first step in the phase-in of diesel engine standards meant to cut particulate emissions by more than 80 percent and smog-forming nitrogen oxides (NO X ) emissions by 90 percent. Industry can’t even agree with itself about this effect. Source: ERM 2022 ).

article thumbnail

Shale Gas & Public Health Conference: Economically, Socially Deprived Areas In PA Have A Much Greater Chance Of Having Oil & Gas Waste Disposed In Their Communities

PA Environment Daily

In Pennsylvania there was also this big increase in local employment in oil and gas sector from 2007 to 2012. And so as of 2022, I was just checking these numbers, there's been about $2.2 billion put back into Pennsylvania communities from these fees. Likely not.

article thumbnail

FracTracker Alliance: Lycoming Creek Watershed Oil & Gas Drilling Impact Analysis In Lycoming County

PA Environment Daily

The first unconventional shale gas well was drilled in the Lycoming Watershed in May 2007. The water quality in an HQ stream can be lowered only if a discharge is the result of necessary social or economic development, the water quality criteria are met, and all existing uses of the stream are protected.

article thumbnail

California Must Extend Zero Emission Vehicle Funding from “AB 8 Fees”

Union of Concerned Scientists

These fees generate more than $100 million per year to fund zero emission vehicle (ZEV) incentives, electric vehicle chargers and hydrogen fueling stations through the Air Quality Improvement Program (AQIP), Clean Transportation Program (CTP), and Enhanced Fleet Modernization Program (EFMP).