2003 Law Natural Resources 
Legal Planet
MARCH 19, 2023
Supreme Court hears oral arguments in the last natural resources cases on its docket this Term: Arizona v. But the federal government and the intervening states may have the law on their side–that law being the “Law of the River,” a complex, century-old set of interstate compacts, U.S.
PA Environment Daily
APRIL 4, 2023
On April 4, the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources announced permits for the ATV Regional Trail Connector Pilot Program in the northcentral region of the state are now available for purchase. DCNR recently revised its ATV trail policy, which lifted the moratorium on new trails that had been in place since 2003.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Arnold Porter
JUNE 2, 2021
The mere fact that the in-house lawyers were employed by a subsidiary of a company established in the Netherlands and performed activities ultimately in the interests of the head office in the Netherlands was insufficient to justify Dutch law on the charter being applicable. 5) {2003} EWCA Civ 474.]] Significance.
The Energy Law
JANUARY 28, 2021
In 2003, the Louisiana Supreme Court rendered its landmark decision in Corbello, et al. Those allegations form the basis of alleged violations of Chapter 4 of the Louisiana Environmental Quality Act: the Louisiana Water Control Law, Louisiana Revised Statute §§ 30:2071 et seq. Iowa Production, et al.
The Energy Law
MARCH 31, 2021
Free-Use Clause and Further Interprets Conflicting Royalty Clause Provisions The Texas Supreme Court recently issued its anticipated decision in BlueStone Natural Resources II, LLC v. Randle , affirming in part and reversing in part the lower court’s ruling. 19-0459, 2021 WL 936175 (Tex.
The Energy Law
MARCH 31, 2021
The Texas Supreme Court recently issued its anticipated decision in BlueStone Natural Resources II, LLC v. By way of background, the lessor royalty owners originally entered into a form lease agreement in 2003; the lease provided that royalty payments were based on “the market value at the well.” 19-0459, 2021 WL 936175 (Tex.
The Energy Law
MARCH 11, 2020
UNOCAL appealed to the Fifth Circuit, arguing, inter alia , that Sojitz’s claim for equitable subrogation failed as a matter of law because the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (“OCSLA”) does not grant BSEE a civil claim for monetary damages based on a party’s failure to perform decommissioning to which Sojitz could subrogate.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
246 
Let's personalize your content