Remove category court-decisions
article thumbnail

The Latest in the Mountain Valley Pipeline Case

Legal Planet

The Fourth Circuit quickly halted it again but was overturned earlier today by the Supreme Court. But this time I think the Court got it right. Congress should not intervene on decisions about particular projects, and natural gas pipelines fuel global warming. Congress recently gave the pipeline the go-ahead.

Law 189
article thumbnail

Catch 22 at the Supreme Court

Legal Planet

I want to focus on the disingenuous way the Supreme Court deals with a previous ruling, and its implications for states. CT , the Supreme Court said this: We hold that the Clean Air Act and the EPA actions it authorizes displace any federal common law right to seek abatement of carbon-dioxide emissions from fossil-fuel fired power plants.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

The Illusions of Takings Law

Legal Planet

For the last century, the Supreme Court has tried to operationalize the idea that a government regulation can be so burdensome that it amounts to a seizure of property. The Court’s decision last week in Cedar Point Nursery v. No, that’s not quite the language the Court used.) Hassid illustrates both points.

Law 163
article thumbnail

E-Discovery Update: Louisiana Third Circuit Affirms Defendant’s Authority to Govern Its Own E-Discovery Protocols

The Energy Law Blog

The Louisiana Third Circuit recently ​affirmed a trial court discovery ruling that allowed the defendant to design its own e-discovery protocol without input from plaintiffs. In doing so, the Third Circuit bolstered the longstanding principle that trial courts have considerable discretion over discovery issues. 23-0372 (La.

article thumbnail

The European Court of Human Rights’ April 9 Climate Rulings and the Future (Thereof)

Law Columbia

This photo shows the inside of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in Strasbourg, eastern France, on February 7, 2019. As domestic decision-makers failed them, they knocked at Strasbourg’s door. As domestic decision-makers failed them, they knocked at Strasbourg’s door. This clear statement by the Court is most welcome.

article thumbnail

Post-Sackett Wetland Delineation Process Raises Questions

Ohio Environmental Law

Supreme Court in Sackett v. See, prior post discussing Sackett) The Court limited federal jurisdiction to only wetlands that are adjacent to navigable waters and those with a continuous surface connection to relatively permanent waters adjoining navigable waters. (See, Following the Supreme Court’s decision in SWANCC v.

article thumbnail

What power does the state have over land-use regulation in California?

Legal Planet

A big court ruling in California land-use law happened last month – and it has really large implications for the state’s efforts to address California’s housing crisis. CARLA appealed to the Court of Appeal, which reversed the trial court’s decision and sent the project back to the city to consider consistent with the HAA.