article thumbnail

NEPA in the Supreme Court (Part II)

Legal Planet

Or suppose BLM is deciding whether to approve a private project on its land that will produce a lot of air pollution. The emissions may require a permit from EPA as a major source, but EPA has authority over the facility’s pollution control system rather than whether it should be built. It chose not to do so. Argument 3.

article thumbnail

SCOTUS Rules in Favor of Sewage: You Can’t Make This Sh** Up

Union of Concerned Scientists

This is why the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law’s historic investments provided a long overdue federal commitment to improving and protecting water quality (and why current threats to it and the agencies like EPA administering funds are so misguided). Upgrading infrastructure is expensive!

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Shell Falcon Pipeline LP Pleads No Contest To Criminal Charges For Violating The State Clean Streams Law In Allegheny, Beaver, Washington Counties; Will Pay $300,000 In Penalties

PA Environment Daily

These penalties are in addition to a $670,000 civil penalty DEP accessed against Shell Falcon Pipeline and its contractor Minnesota Limited LLC for violations of its permit and other laws and regulations that occurred in 2019 and 2020 during pipeline construction. Read more here. Read more here. Decrease To 31.2%

Law
article thumbnail

Newsom Proposes More Oil Drilling In CA

Legal Planet

Last Thursday, the Newsom Administration proposed a new law allowing extensive additional oil drilling in California, as long as the new wells are in existing oil fields and the oil company closes one well in the oil field for each one drilled and one in health a safety designated areas.

article thumbnail

Reflections on a Half Century of Environmental Law Practice

Acoel

This year marks my 50 th year practicing environmental law. In 1967, I graduated from Brandeis University and worked that summer in Edison, NJ as an analytical chemist for one of EPAs predecessorsthe Federal Water Pollution Control Administration, not appreciating any potential relevance to my future profession.

Law
article thumbnail

Minnesota Extends January 1, 2026, PFAS Reporting Deadline to July 1, 2026

Nanotech

The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) announced on July 23, 2025, that it will extend the January 1, 2026, deadline for reporting products containing intentionally added per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) to July 1, 2026. MPCA states that it is using its existing statutory authority to move the reporting due date.

article thumbnail

Six Sleeper Proposals in Project 2025

Legal Planet

Obviously they couldn’t just be underpaid public servants doing their best to implement the law.) Crippling air pollution control. Given its passion for fossil fuels, it shouldn’t be a surprise that Project 2025 takes a dim view of pollution control. 402-404] #5.