This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
One issue is the reduction in smokestack carbon pollution that hydrogen cofiring can actually offer. That means that, for a plant to generate the same amount of electricity, it needs to burn more of a gas-hydrogen blend. Electrolysis involves using electricity to separate water into hydrogen and oxygen. So far, so good.
The destruction we see today is a direct result of decades of dependence on fossilfuels, enabled by decades of deception and obstruction on the part of the fossilfuel industry, and prolonged by decades of inaction on the part of policymakers who have been in their thrall.
A substantial portion of the guidance and supporting materials is dedicated to electrolytic production of hydrogen; i.e., using electricity to split water into hydrogen and oxygen. In particular, emissions loopholes related to biomethane and fugitive methane (i.e., These are the key issues to watch in the time ahead.
The ongoing pollution from these power plants is an affront to public health and wildly incompatible with every climate ambition this country —and this world—has. Which means the consequences of these polluters unabashedly continuing to pollute aren’t just severe—they’re compounding. EPA decision, but it did not ground EPA.
The new law creates a permitting process for polluting companies to capture carbon dioxide emissions and store them in underground chambers. The move represents a lifeline for fossilfuel use in a decarbonizing energy grid. Wisconsin faces difficulty enforcing pollutioncontrol from small farms. Looking Ahead.
Pollutioncontrol is expensive and air pollution regulations are not strict enough. The world is trying to get away from burning fossilfuels for energy because it’s a major source of air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. So, what is the solution?
Of Environmental Professionals Inviting Presentation Proposals For Annual Conference Sept. 10-12 In State College [PaEN] Public Participation -- PA Environmental Educators Urge Action In Response To New Federal Directives Impacting Environmental Education; Take National Survey Gathering Insights From Educators [PaEN] -- PA, NY To Host Feb.
On March 24, the US Environmental Protection Agency posted information on how industries regulated under a variety of federal Clean Air Act programs could obtain Presidential Exemptions from those requirements.
A catalytic converter is a component part of the exhaust system of a fossilfuel motor vehicle that catalyzes, or accelerates the break down of vehicle emissions making them less harmful. Rare earth metals are not only used in automobile pollutioncontrol devices (and not just in the U.S. It is not pandemic related.
Dick Thornburgh [PaEN] -- PUC Launches Review Of Electric Grid Impacts From Data Center Growth, Sets April 24 Hearing [PaEN] -- Pittsburgh Business Times: CMUs Energy Week Tackles Balancing Sustainability Goals With A.I. -- Utility Dive: PJM Fast-Track Interconnection Process Draws 26.6
Buildings need not be built all-electric to comply with the code standard – appliances and building systems using any fuels are acceptable – but it will be far easier for them to comply if they do. Under WA-26, buildings built with fossilfuels will receive special permits that expire in 2030, while buildings built without them (i.e.,
By approving a fast-track proposal that fails to include clean energy projects, FERCs ruling not only risks Pennsylvanias energy leadership but also higher energy costs to families and consumers and continued emissions of harmful pollution from power plants.
13, 14, 15 -- Committee Schedule TODAY’s Calendar Of Events TODAY 11:00: House Environmental Resources and Energy Committee meets to consider House Bill 2075 (Knowles-R- Schuylkill) abrogating DEP’s air pollutioncontrol regulations covering heavy-duty trucks [Note: DEP already suspended enforcement of these regulations November 6 - Read more here.];
Ned Ketyer Explains The Results Of New Studies Of The Health Impacts Of Natural Gas Development On Children And Adults [PaEN] -- DEP Responds To Emergency Notification Of Uncontrolled Venting Of Natural Gas For Over 10.5 15 [PaEN] -- Williamsport Sun: Loyalsock Twp.
PURPA requires electric utilities to purchase energy and capacity from qualifying renewable energy facilities (“QFs”). The use of natural gas proxy plants to value avoided costs promotes the twin aims of PURPA to encourage development of QFs and reduce reliance on fossilfuels. Background on PURPA. Footnotes. [1]
EPA’s latest proposed rule targeting NOx emissions from fossil-fueledelectric generating units (EGUs) is a classic study of diminishing returns. It marks the seventh round of NOx controls for the EGU sector since 1990. Posted on June 29, 2022 by Eugene M. The downwind air quality benefits are minimal. Eugene M.
Fortunately, I don’t have COPD and I didn’t contract asthma when I was young, perhaps partly because I grew up in a home with an electric range. The study concluded that these childhood asthma cases could have theoretically been prevented by using electric appliances. But other Washingtonians may not be as lucky.
Image via PickPik On May 23, the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) proposed emission limits and guidelines for carbon dioxide from fossilfuel-powered plants. The biggest exception is for those plants that choose to run only part-time, so-called “peaker plants” that turn on when electricity demand is too high for the grid.
The bill is sprawling, covering climate and energy topics as diverse as electric vehicles, building decarbonization, clean energy manufacturing and supply chains, agriculture, and greening the electricity system, all through a range of tax incentives and direct grants. Still, how does a local government tap in?
While some who drive past these refineries don’t have to live near them or work in them, those who do can be harmed by the well-documented effects of refinery pollution on human health. The fossilfuel industry has systematically contaminated our environment with a wide range of toxic chemicals for over a century.
The Governor approved a notable slate of climate legislation with a package that includes more stringent greenhouse gas (GHG) emission targets and measures designed to reduce the state’s reliance on fossilfuels. In signing these bills, the Governor touted the state as the most aggressive actor on climate in the nation. Clean Energy.
So does fossilfuel combustion. The annual operating cost, including electricity and cleaning the filters, is about $550,000. But the fact that the facility exists, Corrigan said, is an indictment of the state’s pollution-control measures. “It’s But the main source of nitrate is not the forest but the field.
It’s strange how their counterparts a few hundred miles north claim the exact opposite – the state’s Air PollutionControl Act somehow gives our governor unilateral power to enact a tax on the power sector without considering any legislative input. This is not how the other RGGI states decided to join either. Army Veteran & Rep.
Of Conservation Districts Awarded Nearly $37,000 To Support 21 District Nonpoint Source Pollution Prevention Projects [PaEN] -- Wilkes-Barre Times: Lacawac Sanctuary Receives Grant For Environmental Stewardship Institute -- DEP Now Accepting Applications For Alternative Fuels Incentive Grants [PaEN] -- PennDOT Announces New Funding Opportunity To Repair (..)
Martin Interim President Of PPL Electric Utilities -- National Fish & Wildlife Foundation Awards $14.9 Million In Grants To Schools, Businesses, Local Governments To Switch To Zero- Or Low-Emission Vehicles; Next Round Of Applications Due Dec. 15 [PaEN] -- Williamsport Sun: Loyalsock Twp. 15 [PaEN] -- Williamsport Sun: Loyalsock Twp.
to 11% UGI Gas Rate Hike Request -- Courier Times: Shocked By Your Higher PECO Electric, Natural Gas Bill? to 11% UGI Gas Rate Hike Request -- Courier Times: Shocked By Your Higher PECO Electric, Natural Gas Bill?
‘Methane pollution, however, is a global problem. Fossilfuelpollution, including methane, is the leading environmental threat to children’s health worldwide, robbing our children and loved ones from reaching their full God-given potential. 1 Price Changes: Natural Gas (+149% to -64.2%); Electric (+18.8%
EPA pollution rules nearly always require pollutioncontrol measures of one kind or another to be implemented at the polluting facility. A key part of that argument is that the Plan steps outside the area of emissions regulation into regulation of sourcing for electricity. That brings us to the West Virginia case.
Environmental Protection Agency, agreeing to decide whether fossilfuel manufacturers have legal standing to challenge an EPA decision under the federal Clean Air Act. That court ruled that the fossilfuel company plaintiffs had failed to establish their legal authority (i.e., “standing”) to bring the action.
They involve reduced protection for endangered species, eliminating energy efficiency rules, blocking new transmission lines, changing electricity regulation to favor fossilfuels, weakening air pollution rules, and encouraging sale of gas guzzlers. #1. Abolish energy markets or adjust them to favor fossilfuels.
New Jersey Federal Court Remanded Hoboken’s Climate Case Against FossilFuel Companies to State Court. As a threshold matter, the court found that it would not be prudent to wait for federal courts of appeal to issue decisions in fossilfuel companies’ appeals of remand orders in other climate change cases.
Given the EPA has the responsibility and the obligation to address carbon pollution, these standards—the first to limit carbon emissions from existing coal- and gas-fired power plants—are long overdue. Those currently operating fossilfuel plants generate 25 percent of U.S. In 2012, coal generated 37 percent of US electricity.
In 2022, Texas, along with several other states and industry groups representing fuel manufacturers (together, Petitioners), challenged EPA’s new emissions standards in court. On March 2, the Sabin Center filed a brief in Texas v. EPA on behalf of the National League of Cities (NLC) and the U.S. Conference of Mayors (USCOM).
Supreme Court denied fossilfuel companies’ petition for writ of certiorari seeking review of the Ninth Circuit’s decision reversing the district court’s 2018 denial of Oakland’s and San Francisco’s motions to remand their climate change nuisance cases to California state court. In re Hawaiian Electric Co. , Chevron Corp.
Unleashing American Energy -- Reconsideration of regulations on power plants (Clean Power Plan 2.0) -- Reconsideration of regulations throttling the oil and gas industry (OOOO b/c) [Rule Reducing Methane Emissions] -- Reconsideration of Mercury and Air Toxics Standards that improperly targeted coal-fired power plants (MATS) -- Reconsideration of mandatory (..)
Unleashing American Energy -- Reconsideration of regulations on power plants (Clean Power Plan 2.0) -- Reconsideration of regulations throttling the oil and gas industry (OOOO b/c) [Rule Reducing Methane Emissions] -- Reconsideration of Mercury and Air Toxics Standards that improperly targeted coal-fired power plants (MATS) -- Reconsideration of mandatory (..)
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content