This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Scientists are sounding the alarm because this warming is shockingly bigbigger than what we would have expected given the long-term warming trend from fossilfuel-caused climate change. where 30,000-plus scientists gathered to present their latest research. But why were 2023 and 2024 so warm? What is albedo?
Policymakers and regulators must act quickly because the market is not going to solve this problem on its own, and its definitely not going to do it in a way that protects low- and middle-income people. State insurance regulators sought more than 70 data points. An anonymized subset of the data was shared with FIO.
Accelerating risks from climate change are colliding with shortcomings in insurance markets—such as a lack of transparent information and affordability provisions—to create a perfect storm for people and communities on the front lines of floods, droughts, and wildfires. It also needs to address structural weaknesses in its insurance programs.’
The very first American trial of a youth climate lawsuit was hardly blockbuster Court TV, but we learned a lot from the proceedings. As I outlined here , Montana state law prohibits the consideration of greenhouse gas emissions or climate impacts–– inside and outside the state’s borders––when reviewing projects and approving permits.
The Canadian Bankers’ Association (CBA) explicitly advocated against climate-related financial policy in their testimony on the Climate-Aligned Finance Act. Our banks are promoting themselves as climate champions while lobbying against regulations that would accelerate climate action.
But that just shows the power of climate alarmism. Over the last few years I helped save enough nuclear plants from being replaced by fossilfuels to prevent a sharp increase in emissions But until last year, I mostly avoided speaking out against the climate scare. Partly that’s because I was embarrassed.
This week’s report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the world’s leading climatescientists, paints a terrifying picture of the future if Canada and the world don’t tackle fossilfuels with urgency. This cap must therefore be strict enough that the industry can no longer expand.
He was appointed as a mediator by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection to work with the environmental community and industry to establish better regulations for water quality monitoring in areas impacted by coal ash. Michael Mann - Climate Champion Award PennFuture honored Dr. Michael E.
This year has brought new evidence of what major fossilfuel companies knew and when about the role their products play in climate change, as well as what they did in spite of what they knew. But these technologies are no substitute for sharp cuts in fossilfuels if we keep the goals of the Paris climate agreement within reach.
Climate Week events highlighted commitments and actions needed from the financial sector and other corporations to support and spur government ambition. I had the honor of moderating one of the latter events, Scientists & Activists vs. FossilFuel Finance.
In this instance, 16 young people from across Montana, who were between 2 and 18 years old when the case was filed in 2020, brought their constitutional climate lawsuit, Held v. Globally, the cumulative number of climate change related cases has more than doubled since 2015, bringing the total number of cases to over 2,000.
California Sues FossilFuel Polluters California’s climate accountability lawsuit is groundbreaking in several ways: California is the first major fossilfuel-producing state to file a climate accountability lawsuit. California Gov.
The world is moving toward a clean energy future, which means the fossilfuel industry won’t be around forever. degrees, the upper limit described by climatescientists to avoid irreversible climate catastrophe. What are the current and future costs of cleaning-up the damages left behind by fossilfuel companies?
The plan must specifically address how EPA will consider the effects of Clean Air Act regulation on the coal industry. Healey issued the CID in connection with an investigation into unfair or deceptive acts or practices in trade or commerce with respect to fossilfuel products and securities. Murray Energy Corp. McCarthy , No.
To get an assessment of the progress thus far, as well as an idea if what has to happen next, I turned to two of my colleagues in the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) Climate & Energy Program: Principal ClimateScientist Rachel Licker and Transmission Policy Manager Sam Gomberg. How cool is that?
Disinformation dulls urgency Climate change denial and skepticism is a key feature of the deep political divide in this nation, fueled by long-running and coordinated campaigns of disinformation , often funded by fossilfuel interests. Not-a-scientist Milloy further pontificated , “This doesn’t kill anybody.
The European Commission proposes replacing natural gas from any source in key sectors of its energy economy, dramatically expanding energy efficiency, renewables “instead of funding the fossilfuel industry elsewhere.” They want energy jobs in the EU. Let's dash into renewable energy at lightning speed.
Global market forces, not our abundance of domestic fossilfuels, set the price of oil and gasoline in the United States." Market dynamics, not overzealous regulations, have imprisoned the industry. That hasn’t stopped lobbyists from pretending otherwise.” Energy independence was not an awful goal.
LNG Exporters Emerge As Big Winners Of Europe Natural Gas Crisis; Price For LNG 10 Times Its Value A Year Ago -- The Guardian: ‘This Is A FossilFuel War’: Ukraine’s Top ClimateScientist Speaks Out -- PA Natural Gas Politicians Want To ‘Unleash’ PA’s Gas Industry - What We Need First Is For Industry To Take Up The Slack; Oil & Gas 2.0;
Note: In December, 2022, DEP finalized regulations reducing volatile organic compounds and methane from existing conventional and unconventional oil and gas facilities. The conventional regulations were challenged in Commonwealth Court by conventional oil and gas operators. Read more here. Dr. Jessica Moerman. “As
Republicans said the final regulations will increase the cost of electricity for individuals and businesses, have a negative impact on jobs and will not significantly reduce carbon pollution. It needs to be an informed decision with equal input from climatescientists and economists. So that was in 1971.
Plaintiffs aim to hold the federal government accountable for worsening the dangers of climate change through increased reliance on fossilfuels and for breach of its fiduciary obligation to protect the atmosphere and oceans under the public trust doctrine. stranded assets. Public Nuisance Cases. over a dozen.
Note: Conventional Oil & Gas Methane, PFOS MCL Regulations.] Don Ritter -- Post-Gazette: Canadian Nuclear Fuel Firm Buying Into Westinghouse Electric Co. Room 105 Rachel Carson Building. See webpage for remote options to join the meeting. Contact: Laura Griffin laurgriffi@pa.gov or 717-772-3277.
At this year’s annual general meetings, major investor-owned fossilfuel corporations are facing fewer climate-related shareholder proposals than at any time since the adoption of the Paris climate agreement in 2015. But that doesn’t mean they’re under less pressure over their role in driving the climate crisis.
Its no surprise that this anti-science, pro-fossilfuel administration wants to go after the Endangerment Finding. Of course, an honest assessment of the latest climate science will show that since 2009 the evidence has become even more compelling and dire. What is the Endangerment Finding?
HERE ARE THE ADDITIONS TO THE CLIMATE CASE CHART SINCE UPDATE # 126. Fourth Circuit Declined to Stay Remand Order in Baltimore’s Climate Case Against FossilFuel Companies; Companies Sought Stay from Supreme Court. Court Dismissed Counterclaims in ClimateScientist’s Defamation Lawsuit. FEATURED CASE.
It makes them ripe for disproportional impacts from climate change, relative to the nation in general. Hope through the haze That question can easily be extended to ask, in what world is it okay to allow our crowning jewels of nature and landscapes to be depleted by our extraction of fossilfuels?
The project will also contribute to “ carbon lock-in ” – the process by which expanding oil and gas infrastructure causes continued dependence on fossilfuels. This approach has been used to assess the responsibility of specific entities, such as national governments and carbon emitting companies, to climate change-related harms.
In this case, it removed the ability of the government agency the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), to regulate emissions from power plants, making it one of the only countries in the world where the government can’t intervene to set emission standards. The US President had previously asked the EPA to set emission rules for power plants.
Its no surprise that this anti-science, pro-fossilfuel administration wants to go after the Endangerment Finding. Of course, an honest assessment of the latest climate science will show that since 2009 the evidence has become even more compelling and dire. What is the Endangerment Finding?
President Trump and congressional Republicans have made clear their intention to boost fossilfuel company profits by expanding drilling and slashing environmental and public health protections. UCS has been a leader in peer-reviewed scientific research linking climate impacts to emissions that trace directly to fossilfuel companies.
While these nominations are dangerous, whats even more disturbing is the opening they create for fossilfuel corporations that have masterminded climate deception campaigns to regain social license. And weve already seen a resurgence of outright climate science denial.
To limit the public health and economic costs of the climate crisis, the country must transition quickly from fossilfuels to clean energy and invest in resiliencebut of course the Trump administration is hell-bent on doing the exact opposite. How costly? Guess who that crooked math benefits?
As I described in those posts, the basic deal on offer in the Manchin and Barrasso bill was easing permitting for some fossilfuel projects (especially liquified natural gas (LNG) terminals) in return for federal preemption of at least some state and local regulation of important transmission lines.
The federal district court for the Northern District of California denied Oakland’s and San Francisco’s motions to remand their climate change public nuisance lawsuits against five major fossilfuel producers to state court. Federal Court Dismissed Challenge to Executive Order on Reducing Regulation. Public Citizen, Inc.
The news that started leaking last Friday is that the Trump administration wants to break up the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and essentially end NOAAs climate work by abolishing its primary research office and forcing the agency to instead help boost U.S. power generation, Canary Medias Dan McCarthy reported.
Fossilfuel and chemical polluters, business lobbyists and conservative private land interests have fought these laws and the EPA since their inception and they made fresh headway during the Trump administration, which undertook a widespread effort to gut environmental protections and slashed staffing of the EPA back to levels of the 1980s.
Supreme Court reinstates Trump administration Clean Water Act regulation. Maryland General Assembly passes major climate legislation. It was a familiarly stark report card on the world’s progress on cutting emissions from the IPCC, which has been monitoring climate change since 1988. Executive Branch. International.
Regarding the repeal of the FHWA’s GHG Performance Measure, the court found that the existing evidence indicated that “substantive policy considerations” were the basis for repeal even though the executive order precipitated the FHWA’s review of its regulations.
But theres a more insidious culprit with far greater responsibility for the climate mess were in: major fossilfuel corporations such as BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil, and Shell. UCS is providing links to more than a dozen internal documents , company reports, and other key pieces of evidence so you can assess them yourself.
A few general resources: Sidelining Science Since Day One: How the Trump administration has harmed public health and safety in its first six months by The Union of Concerned Scientists I Heart ClimateScientists. . pulling out of the Paris climate deal may make China great again. Trump regulators trigger pollution fight.
White House floats revising Trump-era NEPA rule to consider all climate impacts. The Biden administration proposed Wednesday reviving portions of a regulation underpinning federal environmental reviews, reversing Trump administration changes that limited consideration of climate impacts in agency project evaluations.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content