This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Because of the way the climate and ocean systems respond to heat-trapping emissions, sea levels will continue to rise even after air temperatures stabilize. Research with climate models in recent years shows that when carbondioxide emissions stop, the rise in atmospheric temperatures will likely also stop.
The next week has the potential to bring important developments for international governance of marine carbondioxide removal (CDR). seaweed) for carbon storage. Some are land-based, while others use the ocean. In order to answer these questions, further research, including in-ocean research, is needed.
It is also necessary to remove carbondioxide from the atmosphere (a process known as carbondioxide removal or CDR). A new Sabin Center report explores the laws governing seaweed cultivation and sinking for CDR in Alaska. This, in turn, enables the ocean to absorb more carbondioxide from the atmosphere.
The Supreme Courts decision could have implications for certain marine carbondioxide (mCDR) activities that require permits under the CWA. mCDR refers to ocean-based processes or techniques designed to remove carbondioxide from the atmosphere and store it for long periods of time in the ocean.
Scientists have identified a number of land- and ocean-based carbondioxide removal (CDR) approaches. Early efforts primarily focused on land-based approaches, but interest in ocean-based approaches, also known as marine CDR, has grown in recent years. ocean waters. judge-made) law.
Our planet is undergoing significant changes due to climate disruption, with especially severe impacts on the ocean. The Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change underscores the urgent need the advance carbondioxide removal (CDR) as a complement to (but not a substitute for) emissions reductions.
The Sabin Center today published model federal legislation to advance safe and responsible oceancarbondioxide removal (CDR) research in U.S. Controlled field trials and other in-ocean research is critical to improve scientific and societal understanding of CDR techniques that could help the U.S. reach its climate goals.
The Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change underscores the need for carbondioxide removal (CDR) to complement emissions reductions in meeting global climate targets. Ocean-based CDR strategies, which aim to increase the oceans natural carbon sink capacity, are gaining attention.
Today, climate change is the central, though by no means the only, concern in environmental law. The earliest mentions of these terms in the law review literature came in the late 1970s, and only one of the pre-1985 discussions took a comprehensive look at the problem. Awareness of the issue began slowly, however.
Lead author Adam Gold , a watershed researcher for the Environmental Defense Fund, said the wild uncertainty is because the court arbitrarily created a new standard for federal protection divorced from the science of how wetlands support larger streams, rivers, lakes and the ocean. Such a test leaves protection to the mercy of the states.
The Sabin Center published a new report today recommending actions that federal agencies could take to ensure safe and responsible permitting and regulation of oceancarbondioxide removal (CDR) research in U.S. A variety of ocean-based CDR approaches—i.e., Those activities could raise a host of legal issues. and the U.S.
The Sabin Center wrapped up Climate Week NYC last Friday with an event exploring the opportunities and challenges posed by ocean-based carbondioxide removal (CDR). As evidenced by the 150-plus people in attendance, ocean CDR is attracting growing attention as a possible climate change mitigation option.
As another year comes to a close, I am reflecting on the incredible progress Ocean Conservancy has made in 2023 towards a healthy, resilient ocean future. For better or worse, this is the nature of ocean conservation work—sometimes we hit roadblocks, but it’s a reminder of why this work is so critically important.
Addressing methane is critically important in addressing climate change – methane is the second largest contributor to human-driven warming after carbondioxide. and international laws may apply to field research and deployment. on land or in the ocean), and the nature and location of their impacts.
A new report published today by the Sabin Center examines the laws governing international transport of carbondioxide for sequestration. We focus, specifically, on the shipping of carbondioxide that was captured in Europe to the United States for sequestration there.
Can the new advisory opinion interpreting the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) move us beyond the lethargy of unmet climate change policy needs ? By accepting the COSIS request, ITLOS boldly advanced the international law of climate change to take full account of its harmful impacts on the marine environment.
Ocean alkalinity enhancement (OAE) is one of several proposed techniques for removing carbondioxide from the atmosphere and storing it in the oceans. OAE seeks to counteract ocean acidification, while also increasing carbon storage in the oceans. By Romany M. Webb and Korey Silverman-Roati.
Assessments by the IPCC have made clear that the most feasible way for the world to meet its target of restricting climate change to below two degrees Celsius of warming includes rapid and massive expansion of carbon removal technology – technology that would extract carbondioxide and permanently sequester that carbondioxide underground.
Human activity adds more than 50 gigatons of carbondioxide to the atmosphere each year. New Solid Carbon technology might be able to lock climate-warming carbondioxide below ocean bedrock. Large-scale solutions are urgently needed. Photo credit: Francisco Anzola, Flickr CC BY 2.0. By Dr Kate Moran.
Two reports published in the US look seriously at the practicalities and responsibilities of altering the ocean to tackle the climate crisis. Yet the technologies needed to do this, collectively known as carbondioxide removal (CDR), remains nascent, underfunded and largely unregulated. The ocean as a carbon sink.
The Sabin Center today released the second in a series of white papers discussing legal issues associated with different ocean-based carbondioxide removal techniques. the growing of kelp and other macroalgae which may be harvested for food, bioenergy, or other uses or sunk in the ocean to sequester the carbon it contains.
Support for carbondioxide removal (CDR) is growing globally. In its Sixth Assessment Report , released last year, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concluded that global carbondioxide emissions must reach net-zero by the early 2050s to limit warming to 1.5 By Carolina Arlota and Korey Silverman-Roati.
The atmospheric concentration of carbondioxide—the most commonly emitted greenhouse gas—is now higher than at any time in at least the last 800,000 years and likely several million years. It will also be necessary to remove carbondioxide from the atmosphere. law to different ocean CDR techniques.
This paper presents recommended actions that federal agencies could take, under existing law, to ensure safe and responsible permitting and regulation of oceancarbondioxide removal (CDR) research in U.S.
The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) issued an advisory opinion on April 21, 2024 in response to a request submitted by the Commission of Small Island States on Climate Change and International Law (COSIS). 52-54) and acknowledged the critical role the ocean plays in regulating the climate system (para.
In a blog post last month, I wrote about the growing interest in ocean-based carbondioxide removal (CDR), and the complex legal issues it raises. Much of the legal complexity surrounding ocean CDR stems from the fact that the ocean is a shared resource in which all countries, both coastal and landlocked, have an interest.
On May 21, 2024, the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) delivered a long-awaited Advisory Opinion on climate change and international law. To facilitate discussion and the exchange of ideas, the Sabin Center’s Climate Law Blog and Verfassungsblog are partnering on a blog symposium on the ITLOS opinion.
laws governing methane removal via atmospheric oxidation enhancement (AOE). To date, efforts to advance GHG removal have primarily focused on developing carbondioxide removal (CDR) techniques, but another GHG removal approach—atmospheric methane removal (AMR)—is now also beginning to receive attention.
Growing interest in using the oceans to enhance removal of carbondioxide from the atmosphere has in turn spurred more interest in seaweed cultivation. The report analyzed a number of ocean-based techniques and concluded that seaweed cultivation could be a “compelling” oceancarbondioxide removal (CDR) strategy.
On May 21, 2024, the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) released its long-awaited advisory opinion on climate change. There was little discussion, either in the written statements or at the oral hearing, of so-called “marine geoengineering” activities that seek to use the ocean to combat climate change.
His work focuses on the legal frameworks governing ocean-based carbondioxide removal, at both the national and international levels. Ashwin graduated from Columbia Law School in 2024 with an LL.M. Ashwin graduated from NALSAR University of Law, India with a B.A. in 2020, and is qualified to practice law in India.
The Sabin Center for Climate Change Law posted its Summer/Fall 2022 Semi-Annual Report, which includes a su mmary of the Center’s key activities between June and December 2022. Romany Webb was appointed to several steering committees convened by, among others, the National Sea Grant Law Center and the American Geophysical Union.
Last week I had the tremendous honor of providing expert testimony on the ocean effects of climate change to the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) in Hamburg, Germany. Currently, 168 countries are party to UNCLOS, and this is the first time that climate change-related matters have been applied to the Law of the Sea.
As global efforts to tackle climate change intensify, attention is turning to carbondioxide removal (CDR)strategies that draw carbondioxide from the atmosphere and store it for long periods. Sargassum absorbs carbondioxide through photosynthesis and, under certain conditions, sinks naturally to the ocean floor.
This post is part of a series of blogs written by Vermont Law School students visiting Bonn, Germany as part of the Vermont Law School COP 23/CMP13 Observer Delegation. . By Val Fajardo, 3L Student at Vermont Law School. Oceans Action Day. Because The Ocean” Declaration. Vermont Journal of Environmental Law.
Creator: George Stoyle The oceans absorb large quantities of the carbondioxide emitted by human activities. This “sink” function is so significant that, until 1957, one objection to a causal link between anthropogenic emissions and global warming was that the oceans would absorb most of the excess CO2, thus breaking this link.
The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA), signed into law on November 15, 2021, amended Section 40307 of the Outer Continental Shelfs Act (OCSLA) to provide authority to the U.S.
A recent post by Dan Farber at Legal Planet discussed the issue of when climate awareness began to enter American law. The most notable was by an administrative law professor at Harvard, one Stephen Breyer. Third, there was so much else going on in environmental law. were in 1978 articles about nuclear energy.
The Sabin Center for Climate Change Law posted its Winter/Spring 2023 Semi-annual Report, which includes a summary of the Center’s key activities between January and June 2023. The Center continued to maintain the Model Laws for Deep Decarbonization in the United States website. It is available for download here. and internationally.
What is Environmental Law? Humanity has been aware of its environment far longer than there have been laws to protect environments. However, the term “environmental law” does not just cover government legislation. These are not “laws” per se but act as such within a regulatory framework. Useful Environmental Law Terms.
A 2021 North Carolina law requires the N.C. Utilities Commission (NCUC) to “take all reasonable steps” to achieve a 70% reduction in carbondioxide ( CO 2 ) emissions from electric generating units (EGUs) by 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality for the utility generation system by 2050. The Reduction Goal.
from Chapter 25 of the National Climate Assessment Although some impacts of climate change may be positive as with carbon enrichment leading to greater net primary productivity in pastures, opposite forces often act at the same time–as with the reductions in forage nutritional quality that result alongside increased warming.
Last week I had the tremendous honor of providing expert testimony on the ocean effects of climate change to the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) in Hamburg, Germany. Currently, 168 countries are party to UNCLOS, and this is the first time that climate change-related matters have been applied to the Law of the Sea.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content