This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
It is mind- bog -gling, syllable pun intended, that scientists still do not know how many wetlands lost protection in last year’s crippling of the CleanWaterAct by the Supreme Court. The buffering effect of the wetlands spared many communities in the area the worst of flooding from Superstorm Sandy in 2012.
The Corps’ definition of whether property constitutes “waters of the United States” is significant because the CleanWaterAct regulates the discharge of pollutants into “the waters of the United States.” The Corps has defined the waters of the United States very broadly, along the lines of the Commerce Clause.
The Supreme Court will decide which wetland ecosystems are included in the CleanWaterAct, the law that regulates the dumping of pollutants into American waters. Amidst drought, farmers in southern Taiwan are being paid not to grow crops as the government reserves water for semiconductor production.
where the Court held that, in limited circumstances, a party discharging pollutants into groundwater that ultimately end up in navigable waters will need a permit under the CleanWaterAct. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, et al. 33 U.S.C. §§ 1311(a), 1362(12)(A); see also 33 U.S.C. 1342 (NPDES provisions).
The Supreme Court is stepping once more into CleanWaterAct “waters of the United States,” more popularly known as WOTUS. If you’re a CleanWaterAct wonk, there may be a little voice in the back of your head yelling, “Theeeey’re baaack!” United States. 3d —, 2022 WL 952072, at *2 (D.
To understand the stormwater permit requirements for oil and gas activities, you need to review not only the regulations that remain in force, but also the CleanWaterAct as amended by the Energy Policy Act of 2005. CWA §402(l)(2). See 73 Fed. 56,572 (Sept. 29, 2008); 77 Fed. 12,286 (Feb.
Environmental law enforcement seeks to achieve greater compliance by punishing intentional violations and ensuring that violators do not achieve a competitive advantage through avoidance of compliance costs. Over the last 10 fiscal years (2012-21), state penalties for CleanWaterAct violations averaged $12,901.
In this regard, the legal commentary has placed a high degree of emphasis on the jurisdictional question under Section 404 of the CleanWaterAct of whether a planned activity will involve the discharge of dredged or fill material into “waters of the United States.” See 77 Fed. 10184 (Feb.
The Bay’s grade is a “C,” unchanged since 2012 when the 2011 “D+” was upgraded to a “C.” In 2010, following years of missed deadlines, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) jumped into the morass by exercising its power under the CleanWaterAct. in Environmental Law. Vermont Journal of Environmental Law.
The contractors were also charged with certain misdemeanor CleanWaterAct violations. In September 2012, Black Elk hired Compass Engineering and Consulting, LLC (“Compass”) to draft construction plans for maintenance on the platforms.
1961 – seeks to close existing loopholes and provide additional federal oversight where current state laws do not apply. At first glance, though, existing laws would seem applicable to the spill at Freedom Industries. However, West Virginia law. A new Senate bill – S. have addressed the spill.
Because Sparrows Point was the biggest employer in the state, EPA and the Maryland Department of the Environment did little to enforce compliance with environmental laws despite major violations throughout the 1970s, ‘80s and ‘90s. This public health threat gave urgency to the need to clean up the site.
That should change now that the Department of Justice (DOJ), acting jointly on behalf of EPA and BSEE, has announced its settlement with ATP Infrastructure Partners (ATP-IP) in the first joint judicial enforcement action resolving alleged violations of both the CleanWaterAct (CWA) and Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA).
In A Year of Water Quality Reckoning, National Imperative is Impeded Law and policy treat farms as special class of polluter. Fifty years ago the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement was signed and the CleanWaterAct was enacted to clear pollution from the region’s waters. Photographs by J.
The last new facility to come online was in 2012. News Briefs Congress Passes Resolution to Overturn Administration’s CleanWater Rules The Senate joined the House in passing a resolution to overturn the Biden administration’s rules for determining which water bodies are protected by the federal CleanWaterAct.
In 2012, the company became infamous again when it unsuccessfully sued Ben-Jei Tsuang, a professor at the Department of Environmental Engineering in National Chun Hsing University, who published a paper linking high cancer rates in Mailiao, Taiwan, to toxic dioxin and heavy metals air pollution from the Six Naphtha Cracking plant.
EPA, Ruling Could Impact the Definition of “Waters of the U.S.”. ESA and other scientific societies file brief arguing that the interpretation of the CleanWaterAct is inherently founded on science. 8965) that would reauthorize existing control of aquatic plant growths and invasive species law through fiscal year 2028.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. South Dakota Federal Court Granted Preliminary Injunction Against Enforcement of Laws Targeting Pipeline Protesters. and non-U.S. climate litigation charts.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. First Circuit Certified State Law Preemption Questions in Case Challenging Local Ordinance Prohibiting Crude Oil Loading at Harbor. and non-U.S. 19-50178 (5th Cir.
The Biden administration moved Thursday to formally repeal the Trump administration’s controversial rule that vastly restricted the scope of CleanWaterAct protections. At the same time, Regan and his water chief, Radhika Fox, have said they want to craft a more “durable” definition of the scope of protections.
21-454, an important appeal involving the scope of federal authority to regulate wetlands under the CleanWaterAct. Earlier this month, Legal Planet colleague Dan Farber wrote a typically-thoughtful post on this site aptly titled, “The Quagmire of CleanWaterAct Jurisdiction.” USEPA , No.
The nation’s highest court will again take on the CleanWaterAct. The nation’s highest court will once again interpret the reach of the CleanWaterAct, the foundational environmental law whose scope has been the subject of court and administrative battles for more than three decades. The Rundown.
OSHA Proposed First Updates to Hazard Communication Standard Since 2012. The risk evaluation’s conclusions that consumer uses do not present an unreasonable risk could preempt state-level restrictions on 1,4-dioxane in personal care, cosmetic, and cleaning products such as restrictions enacted by New York in 2019.[[N:N.Y.
241 ) to reauthorize the Tropical Forest and Coral Reef Conservation Act through 2026. This law provides loan forgiveness for developing countries that meet specific benchmarks and agree to contribute to tropical forest and coral reef conservation. He signed it into law. The full House passed Rep. 335 ) in the Senate in March.
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. By Margaret Barry and Korey Silverman-Roati. and non-U.S. climate litigation charts. If you know of any cases we have missed, please email us at columbiaclimate@gmail.com.
Try explaining that to your new Peruvian sister-in-law. 6, 2012). [7]. However, the Clean Power Plan is currently tied up in the D.C. Environmental law scholars have, nevertheless, devoted tens of thousands of pages of law review articles to debate the plan’s legality by parsing sections 111(d) and 112 of the Clean Air Act.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content