This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
It is mind- bog -gling, syllable pun intended, that scientists still do not know how many wetlands lost protection in last year’s crippling of the CleanWaterAct by the Supreme Court. The buffering effect of the wetlands spared many communities in the area the worst of flooding from Superstorm Sandy in 2012.
The Corps’ definition of whether property constitutes “waters of the United States” is significant because the CleanWaterAct regulates the discharge of pollutants into “the waters of the United States.” The Corps has defined the waters of the United States very broadly, along the lines of the Commerce Clause.
where the Court held that, in limited circumstances, a party discharging pollutants into groundwater that ultimately end up in navigable waters will need a permit under the CleanWaterAct. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, et al. 33 U.S.C. §§ 1311(a), 1362(12)(A); see also 33 U.S.C. 1342 (NPDES provisions).
The Supreme Court is stepping once more into CleanWaterAct “waters of the United States,” more popularly known as WOTUS. If you’re a CleanWaterAct wonk, there may be a little voice in the back of your head yelling, “Theeeey’re baaack!” United States.
The Supreme Court will decide which wetland ecosystems are included in the CleanWaterAct, the law that regulates the dumping of pollutants into American waters. Amidst drought, farmers in southern Taiwan are being paid not to grow crops as the government reserves water for semiconductor production.
Posted on March 28, 2023 by Jeff Porter Inside EPA is reporting that the United States Forest Service is going to work with EPA to obtain National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit coverage under the Federal CleanWaterAct authorizing it to continue fighting forest fires from the air.
The determination involved a water well owned by Bryan Latkanich near Fredericktown, Washington County that was approximately 500 feet away and down-gradient from two shale gas wells on a pad originally developed by Chevron Appalachia, but now owned by EQT CHAP, LLC, a subsidiary of EQT Corporation. Read more here.
To understand the stormwater permit requirements for oil and gas activities, you need to review not only the regulations that remain in force, but also the CleanWaterAct as amended by the Energy Policy Act of 2005. CWA §402(l)(2). See 73 Fed. 56,572 (Sept. 29, 2008); 77 Fed. 12,286 (Feb.
In this regard, the legal commentary has placed a high degree of emphasis on the jurisdictional question under Section 404 of the CleanWaterAct of whether a planned activity will involve the discharge of dredged or fill material into “waters of the United States.” See 77 Fed. 10184 (Feb.
For example, under the CleanWaterAct (CWA) Section 309, the statutory penalty maximum of $125,000 for administrative penalties is now $287,632 due to the inflation adjustment. Over the last 10 fiscal years (2012-21), state penalties for CleanWaterAct violations averaged $12,901.
The contractors were also charged with certain misdemeanor CleanWaterAct violations. In September 2012, Black Elk hired Compass Engineering and Consulting, LLC (“Compass”) to draft construction plans for maintenance on the platforms.
In 2012, the Coalition was formed with the mission to obtain national and federal recognition for the Delaware River Watershed. Today, we’re a collective of over 180 nonprofits, and together we advocate to advance sound conservation and cleanwater policy.
Additional funds to address emerging contaminants through water quality permitting. The positions include two new engineers to work on issuance and renewal of CleanWaterAct wastewater discharge permits. The project, restoration of Little Alamance Creek in Burlington, was completed in 2012-2013.
The Bay’s grade is a “C,” unchanged since 2012 when the 2011 “D+” was upgraded to a “C.” In 2010, following years of missed deadlines, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) jumped into the morass by exercising its power under the CleanWaterAct. Researchers at the. The lack of progress is discouraging.
This public health threat gave urgency to the need to clean up the site. We battled through discovery and hired experts, but in May, 2012, Severstal’s successor, R.G. The Waterkeeper organization had members who lived in an economically disadvantaged, largely Black community near the plant known as Dundalk.
That should change now that the Department of Justice (DOJ), acting jointly on behalf of EPA and BSEE, has announced its settlement with ATP Infrastructure Partners (ATP-IP) in the first joint judicial enforcement action resolving alleged violations of both the CleanWaterAct (CWA) and Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA).
Boehner is right in thinking that the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA) and CleanWaterAct (CWA). And Freedom Industries’ chemical tanks were operating within loopholes large enough to fit, well, tanker trucks of drinking water. have addressed the spill.
Fifty years ago the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement was signed and the CleanWaterAct was enacted to clear pollution from the region’s waters. cleanwater statute, though, give farmers and their wastes special treatment. A Weakened National Imperative. Both the bi-national agreement and the U.S.
The last new facility to come online was in 2012. News Briefs Congress Passes Resolution to Overturn Administration’s CleanWater Rules The Senate joined the House in passing a resolution to overturn the Biden administration’s rules for determining which water bodies are protected by the federal CleanWaterAct.
In 2012, the company became infamous again when it unsuccessfully sued Ben-Jei Tsuang, a professor at the Department of Environmental Engineering in National Chun Hsing University, who published a paper linking high cancer rates in Mailiao, Taiwan, to toxic dioxin and heavy metals air pollution from the Six Naphtha Cracking plant.
EPA, Ruling Could Impact the Definition of “Waters of the U.S.”. ESA and other scientific societies file brief arguing that the interpretation of the CleanWaterAct is inherently founded on science. The proposed rule finds that the freshwater fish species is threatened by agricultural water use in the region and dams.
When EPA is carrying out its responsibilities under the CleanWaterAct, it needs to know what the latest high-quality research indicates about health harms associated with various pollutants. EPAs first scientific integrity policy took effect in 2012.
Forest Service (USFS) from proceeding with timber management actions in 11 national forests in Arizona and directed the FWS and the USFS to reinitiate a formal Section 7(a)(2) consultation pursuant to the Endangered Species Act to reassess the jeopardy analysis and the effect of Forest Plans on recovery of the threatened Mexican spotted owl.
Montana Federal Court Agreed to Consider Keystone XL-Specific Documents and 2012 Biological Opinion in Challenge to Authorization Under Nationwide Permit. Army Corps of Engineers’ issue of a Section 404 permit under the CleanWaterAct for a new petrochemical plant on the Mississippi River in Louisiana. Williams , No.
The Biden administration moved Thursday to formally repeal the Trump administration’s controversial rule that vastly restricted the scope of CleanWaterAct protections. By Annie Snider, PoliticoPro, 11/18/2021. or WOTUS. “In The details: The move is largely procedural. United States. 5345 ), sponsored by Rep.
21-454, an important appeal involving the scope of federal authority to regulate wetlands under the CleanWaterAct. Earlier this month, Legal Planet colleague Dan Farber wrote a typically-thoughtful post on this site aptly titled, “The Quagmire of CleanWaterAct Jurisdiction.” USEPA , No.
The nation’s highest court will again take on the CleanWaterAct. The nation’s highest court will once again interpret the reach of the CleanWaterAct, the foundational environmental law whose scope has been the subject of court and administrative battles for more than three decades. The Rundown.
OSHA Proposed First Updates to Hazard Communication Standard Since 2012. OSHA Proposed First Updates to Hazard Communication Standard Since 2012. EPA said specific identities of the 390 chemicals were reported as non-confidential in the 2012, 2016, or 2020 reports submitted under the Chemical Data Reporting rule. 14560 (Mar.
Richmond is a the Presidential Chair in Science and a professor of chemistry at the University of Oregon and has been a member of the National Science Board since 2012. The Army Corps of Engineers is responsible for CleanWaterAct permitting, dams, aquatic ecosystem restoration projects and other issues.
2012 CA 008263 B (D.C. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants violated NEPA, the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, the CleanWaterAct, and the Marine Mammal Protection Act. The court also denied Mann’s motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether statements in the blog post were false.
6, 2012). [7]. We will eliminate the highly invasive “Waters of the US” rule, and scrap the $5 trillion Obama-Clinton Climate Action Plan and the Clean Power Plan and prevent these unilateral plans from increasing monthly electric bills by double-digits without any measurable effect on Earth’s climate. [41]. 2, 2014). [8].
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content