This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
They’re also hoping to circumnavigate efforts to hold them accountable for their contribution to climatechange. Of course, the earth’s climate doesn’t care if emissions are less “intense” relative to another company or production chain. Fighting climate disclosure, especially Scope 3 emissions The U.S.
In other words, the claim shows a lack of knowledge and is a well-known old argument that I commented on Realclimate.org in 2007. A common strawman argument We don’t expect to discern a clear effect of greenhouse gases on local measurements, and mixing up local and global climate is a basis for a common strawman argument.
In part one of this series we introduced you to the huge role that the Canadian financial sector plays in exacerbating the climate crisis. Climatechange could have some very significant negative impacts on the Canadian economy, and therefore your money. In this blog, we’ll discuss how climatechange poses a risk to finance.
The 27 th Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on ClimateChange (COP27) in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt, ended last Sunday, November 20, 1.5 Climatechange related harms that are not avoided by adaptation are referred to as loss and damage. She writes here in her personal capacity. .
Loss and damage, the term for the detrimental impacts of climatechange that cannot be addressed through mitigation or adaptation, will be a central point of discussion at COP27. Despite pointing to the potential for liability as a reason not to provide loss and damage funding under an international agreement, the U.S.
On June 15, 2022, the Municipal Court of Prague sided with a Czech climate NGO in Klimatická žaloba ČR v. Czech Republic , ordering the Czech government to create a more ambitious emissions reduction plan based on its obligations under the ParisAgreement ( Press Release of Czech Climate Litigation ).
Last week, the University of Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne hosted an official COP21 side event: Social Dynamics and ClimateChange. Michael Burger , Executive Director, spoke on a panel that was dedicated to the topic of “climate justice” and the role of courts in the pursuit of such justice. climatechange litigation chart.
L&D has a specific meaning in climate talks that may not be obvious to anyone not immersed in the process: harms caused by climatechange that are not avoided by adaptation. Given any particular trajectory of realized climatechange (which of course depends on how fast emissions are cut), adaptation measures (e.g.,
Plans for a third runway at the Vienna-Schwechat airport (pictured at right) were first submitted for review by the government of Lower Austria (one of Austria’s 9 regions) in March 2007. After reviewing several estimates, the court concluded that a third runway would increase Austria’s annual CO2 emissions by between 1.79 and 2.02% by 2025.
On May 21, 2024, the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) released its long-awaited advisory opinion on climatechange. There was little discussion, either in the written statements or at the oral hearing, of so-called “marine geoengineering” activities that seek to use the ocean to combat climatechange.
The judgment, in German, and an unofficial English translation, along with other documents, are available on the Sabin Center’s Non-US Climate Litigation Database, here.) Germany’s Federal ClimateChange Act requires a 55% gradual reduction of German GHGs by 2030 and a reduction of 80-95% by 2050, compared to 1990. Background.
However, several analyses—including a recent one by the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS)—have concluded that the IRA, even when coupled with the bipartisan infrastructure act and other federal and state climate policies, will not be enough to meet US carbon emission reduction goals. trillion in avoided climatechange-related damages.
While it is undeniable that we are ramping up our actions against climatechange, it is hard to deny that global warming is getting scarier every week. This could increase the speed of climatechange even more as this greenhouse gas is 24 times more potent than carbon dioxide.
Back to North Carolina developments in late 2018: Executive Order on ClimateChange and Clean Energy: On October 29, 2018, N.C. Governor Roy Cooper issued an executive order on climatechange and clean energy. Reduce energy use per square foot in state-owned buildings by 40% from 2002-2003 levels.
More recently, another study showed it had to be done in OECD nations to comply with the ParisAgreement targets. A 2010 US study showed that stopping burning coal could be done by 2030 with renewables and energy efficiency. while GDP grew too.
climate conference descends on the small Brazilian rainforest city of Belm in November 2025, it will be tempting to focus on the drama and disunity among major nations. Only 21 countries had even submitted their updated plans for managing climatechange by the 2025 deadline required under the ParisAgreement.
It was because of smoke during the 2007 wildfire season in the United States, the second worst at the time for acreage burned. Beth Pratt, the California regional executive director for the National Wildlife Federation, told the Guardian newspaper in April, “Yosemite is ground zero for climatechange.” million acres burned.
We know that Trump would exit the ParisAgreement (again). He would also roll back all of Biden’s climate regulations. That would leave federal climate regulation in the same place it was in 2007. The short term damage would be bad enough. We know he would stop enforcing environmental requirements.
The shift, combined with the huge shift from ultra-dirty goal to more-moderately dirty gas helped cut our power sector carbon dioxide emissions by 41 percent from a peak in 2007. degrees Fahrenheit) limits of the 2015 ParisAgreement. degrees Celsius (2.7-degrees
Framework Convention on ClimateChange (UNFCCC). climate policy. EPA’s power to regulate greenhouse gases, established in litigation in 2007, now seems beyond question. remains a party to the UNFCCC , helped broker the ParisAgreement, and is till a party to that agreement today. 1998 U.S.
Pursuant to the text of Clean Air Act Section 202 , along with a 2007 case entitled Massachusetts v. Leaving the ParisAgreement, Again As has been widely reported, the EO Putting America First in International Environmental Agreements sets in motion the process for a U.S. withdrawal from the ParisClimateAgreement.
Damn, it’s Awfully Hot!” – So Long to The Federal Government’s Meddlesome Efforts to Combat ClimateChange. With only one brief peek, it is exceedingly clear that very little will remain of the federal efforts to address climatechange once President Trump takes charge. profile saying that “People prefer warmer climates.
C limit the global community committed to in the ParisAgreement, adopted in 2015. In 2007, the Supreme Court held in Massachusetts v EPA that the term pollutant includes the greenhouse gases that are warming the globe. And the consequences of reversing the endangerment finding will decimate EPA’s regulations.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content