This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Much evidence has surfaced about the tactics to which fossilfuel companies have resorted to distort the facts, intimidate their opponents, and block climate action that might hurt their bottom lines. The following blog is an excerpt from the UCS Report Decades of Deceit. Read the full report here.
Last week, I participated in the Scientists Speakout Day during the Summer of Heat on Wall Street , to protest and disrupt the financial institutions that are enabling the fossilfuel industry (and, as a result, our current climate crisis).
This could be met from a variety of sources—including pollution fees on fossilfuel companies, the elimination of fossilfuel subsidies, and wealth taxes on the richest people. Since then, the World Bank has taken on the role of hosting the fund and serving as its trustee on an interim basis for four years.
Four of our largest banks have recently withdrawn from the UN-backed Net-Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA). For those who closely follow climate finance, this is happenstance because Mark Carney was the driving force behind the global NZBA initiative which our banks are now abandoning.
You or someone you know needs clean backup power Walking my dog the day after Hurricane Milton swept through my Orlando, FL neighborhood, the rumble of fossilfuel-powered generators interrupted what would have been a welcome quiet after the storm. I don’t blame them.
Canada’s big five banks are deservedly feeling more heat lately about their funding of fossilfuels. They are among the worst in the world, pumping $727 billion into fossilfuels since the Paris Agreement was signed, while scoring among the lowest on having policies to rectify this.
For years, fossilfuel companies have socialized the costs of their pollution while privatizing the benefits. Since local and state governments are on the frontlines of paying for worsening wildfires, they should also be on the leading edge of holding fossilfuel companies accountable. Source: YouTube.
Some of this was through a COVID fund specific to oil and gas producers provided by the Business Development Bank of Canada (BDC). million for other categories of support to fossilfuels. The post $18 billion to fossilfuels: Breaking Down the Numbers appeared first on Environmental Defence.
Since the summer of 2021, five Republican-controlled state legislatures have passed bills banning their state governments from doing business with financial institutions that they allege have divested from fossilfuel companies as a result of ESG investment policies. Another six statehouses are considering similar bills.
Three major European banks — Credit Suisse, ING, and BNP Paribas — have announced they will no longer finance the trade of oil extracted from the Amazon Sacred Headwaters region in Ecuador.
Texas and a number of other states have passed laws banning what they call “boycotts of fossilfuel companies.” ” More precisely, they ban state investment or contracting with firms that “boycott” fossilfuel companies. That’s generally — but not always — going to be firms “utilizing” fossilfuels.
If honored, this commitment will likely unseat Canada as the worst-ranking in the G20 for international public financing to the fossilfuel sector. . This means while EDC’s overall fossilfuel support was CAD 13.6 Shifting public finance for energy out of all fossilfuels and into clean energy is an urgent task.
Despite having made commitments to reduce the emissions from their investments and reach net-zero by 2050, Canada’s banks have instead increased their funding in risky oil and gas assets every year since 2020. The banks are also lobbying against climate-related policies. Canadians are being misled.
The dark money behind fossilfuels Climate change is an existential threat to the future of humanity and all life on earth. The post Canada’s banks and pension funds are financing a climate disaster appeared first on Ecojustice. But there is a clear solution to averting.
The federal government’s proposed regulations to reduce emissions in electricity generation are achievable without breaking the bank. In fact, studies show that clean energy is a more affordable option than continuing to rely on fossilfuels.
Another resolution filed by the bank BNP Paribas prodded ExxonMobil to release a report on its climate-related lobbying in March. ExxonMobil also funded the Consumer Energy Alliance , a pro-fracking front group run by PR firms on behalf of fossilfuel companies.
A demonstrator holds a banner during a protest outside the Bank of England during the COP26 UN climate conference. What steps do banks around the world need to take to mitigate the climate crisis and protect themselves and their customers from climate risks and exposure? . Focus on the world’s largest banks. By Anders Lorenzen.
Wind and solar energy facilities emit no air pollution and have minimal environmental effects as compared to fossilfuel plants, but like all types of development, renewable energy projects do have impacts. The resource bank is part of the work of the Renewable Energy Legal Defense Initiative (RELDI).
Today, the Parliamentary Budget Office (PBO) released its assessment that a windfall profits tax on fossilfuel companies could generate $4.2 From the housing crisis to inflation, most people living in Canada are feeling the pinch, but not the fossilfuel companies and their executives, who are benefitting from inflationary prices.
Barclays and HSBC are two of the major banks which continue to fund fossilfuel investments. A report by ShareAction has delivered a damning verdict on European banks connection to fossilfuel investments. Major European banks at the heart of continued fossilfuel support.
In 2022, UCS, COPAL , and our other project partners published the report On the Road to 100 Percent Renewables , along with a state-specific fact sheet outlining how Minnesota could meet its electricity needs completely and equitably with renewable energy by 2035, while dramatically reducing fossilfuel use in vehicles and buildings.
World Bank report sheds light on the nuanced connections between “water shocks” and human migration. World Bank researchers found that people are five times as likely to move following drought conditions as they are after floods or periods of excess water. “That is what makes me sad. Big City Lights.
And despite the mounting warnings from experts, India’s big banks appear to be turning a blind eye to climate risk. . Climate scorecard for India’s banks . A recent analysis offers a rare glimpse into how India’s largest commercial banks think about climate change. You’re talking about extremely large banks,” Fernandes says.
What we really care about is making people better off, not growing their bank accounts. Another is that the costs of renewable energy and electric vehicles have declined so greatly in the past ten years, making them more or less competitive with their fossil-fuel alternatives. Infant mortality in Italy is only half as high.
A 2022 Rainforest Action Network repor t found that “fossilfuel financing from the world’s 60 largest banks has reached USD $4.6 trillion in the six years since the adoption of the Paris Agreement, with $742 billion in fossilfuel financing in 2021 alone.” The biggest US bank investors in fossilfuels? “At
According to the World Bank, “Mexico’s geographic characteristics make it a highly vulnerable country to the adverse impacts of climate change. AMLO has come under criticism for his commitment to fossilfuel production and refining in Mexico. Because of its geography, Mexico is vulnerable to climate impacts.
There’s a direct line of culpability between fossilfuel corporations and climate change – it’s why so many oil and gas CEOs have topped our list of Climate Villains. But they aren’t the only powerful players who shoulder responsibility for keeping us hooked on fossilfuels, the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions.
You have a relationship with your bank and pension, but the way they are managing your money might not be in the best interest of you or the climate. This Valentine’s Day, we ask: how can we fix the broken relationship between financial institutions and climate action, so you can feel good about your bank again?
It is overwhelmingly produced by a process known as steam methane reforming (SMR), which is heavily carbon-polluting, and the resulting hydrogen is primarily consumed as a feedstock for industrial purposes, such as oil refining and fertilizer production, not as a way to displace fossilfuels. And this isn’t just hypothetical.
That is equivalent to what half a million fossil-fueled cars emit annually. Repurposing cropland could mean water security In the Central Valley, 64 small disadvantaged communities (42% of those studied) are crossed by a river or a canal, of which 48 have an excellent recharge banking potential. miles away from a canal.
End FossilFuel Subsidies In 2024, the Government of Canada provided nearly $30 billion to the fossilfuel and petrochemical industries. Thats a massive amount of taxpayer money that went towards making it cheaper to find, extract, process, transport, and export fossilfuels. billion in one year alone.
Ecojustice, Greenpeace Canada, Stand.earth, Environmental Defence Canada, Keepers of the Water, Leadnow, For Our Kids, and Change Course call on the five major Canadian banks to take responsibility for the impact of their investments in fossilfuels, which are exacerbating the climate crisis.
What do the CEO of Imperial Oil, the head of RBC bank and the head of Big Oil’s biggest lobby association, the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers, all have in common? And they’re preventing efforts to build a healthy, equitable world beyond fossilfuels. That makes them three of Canada’s top ‘climate villains’.
Financial institutions such as banks, pension managers, asset managers and insurance companies are the primary players in the finance game. Climate change is driven by the release of greenhouse gas emissions from the burning of fossilfuels. Banks are not the only culprits funding the fossilfuel industry.
more than 15,000 comments, many of which the SEC must legally answer in writing; threats of lawsuits from ideological groups funded in part by the fossilfuel industry; and complaints about the proposed requirement to measure and disclose heat-trapping gas emissions from a company’s full value chain, known as Scope 3 emissions.
This council suggested labeling fossilfuel activities like CCUS (carbon capture, utilization, and storage) as sustainable, as well as some types of oil and gas expansion. Labeling fossilfuel activities as sustainable is like including a harpooned whale under Ocean Wise, or describing a peanut butter and jelly sandwich as nut-free.
Data reported by the World Bank show that prices for two key fertilizers spiked dramatically between April 2021 and April 2022: diammonium phosphate prices went up 75 percent and potash prices rose a staggering 178 percent.
except for the banks, pension funds, and insurers who make investments across our economy. The issue is that our banks, pension funds and insurance companies take our hard-earned money and heavily invest in fossilfuels. However, these companies can’t be banking on climate failure forever. Why financial regulation?
Nearly all of these plastics are made from fossilfuels including crude oil, natural gas liquids and coal. Ocean plastics, such as those collected by our International Coastal Cleanup partners last week on beaches and waterways around the world, are a product of the fossilfuel industry that is driving climate change.
Federal government releases new policy aimed at ending international public financing for fossilfuels, next step is ending domestic financing . This new policy will end a significant portion of EDC’s support for fossilfuels and redirect those funds to support the clean energy transition.
The joint appeal, which can be viewed here , calls upon financial service providers to take urgent and effective action to transition out of fossilfuel financing and to invest in renewable energies and research for climate solutions. ” Stop all new fossilfuels projects.
Despite formally recognizing for the first time that a transition from fossilfuel use is necessary, nations failed to agree to the fast, fair, and funded phase-out that scientists are calling for. One big positive from COP28 was the creation of a Loss and Damage fund to address climate impacts in the Global South.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content