article thumbnail

Australian Federal Court dismisses the novel duty of care previously found in Sharma: what does it mean for future climate litigation in Australia?

Law Columbia

In September 2020, eight students and their litigation legal representative (a nun who can legally represent the children in court) filed a climate class action lawsuit in the Federal Court of Australia on their behalf and on behalf of other Australian children. Sharma and Others and its impact for climate litigation in Australia.

article thumbnail

Guest commentary: A ground-breaking judgment in Germany

Law Columbia

In 2020 the German population amounted to 1.1% is politically insufficiently ambitious, but such a choice remains within the significant discretion of the legislature (ΒΆΒΆ159-162). Last but not least: the precautionary principle requires that potentially colossal damage be averted. A swift political reaction.

2030 44
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Guest Commentary: An Unexpected Success for Czech Climate Litigation

Law Columbia

ministries in this case) and not the general public, is a result of governmental political decision, not an exercise of public administration. The court thus found that the defendants were in delay since December 18, 2020, when the UNFCCC Secretariat received an updated EU NDC.

article thumbnail

Nuclear Plant Closures And Renewables Increase Electricity Prices & Unreliability, Testifies Michael Shellenberger to U.S. Senate

Environmental Progress

The answer is that there was a lot more generating capacity in 2006 than in 2020. 13] California regulators in 2020 over-estimated the contribution they could reasonably expect from renewables. In 2020, California generated 39 percent of its in-state electricity from them. [15] In 2020, California’s electricity prices rose 7.5

article thumbnail

February 2020 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

Law Columbia

The majority said it β€œreluctantly” concluded that β€œthe plaintiffs’ case must be made to the political branches or to the electorate at large” and β€œ[t]hat the other branches may have abdicated their responsibility to remediate the problem does not confer on Article III courts, no matter how well-intentioned, the ability to step into their shoes.”

2020 40