This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
This could be met from a variety of sources—including pollution fees on fossilfuel companies, the elimination of fossilfuel subsidies, and wealth taxes on the richest people. Climate vulnerable countries need funding to start flowing quickly. Progress on support for climate adaptation.
The fossilfuel industry has long been the main driver of climatechange, but Big Oil’s CEOs and profiteers would like you to believe that it is a part of the solution. One of the people peddling this idea is the man behind Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNRL) – Murray Edwards, the FossilFuel Fanatic.
is a serious blow to the EPA’s ability to fight climatechange—and could have dangerous repercussions beyond this case. The timing of the decision feels especially harsh, as the nation is in the throes of the “ Danger Season ” for hazards such as heat waves, drought, wildfires and hurricanes, all worsened by climatechange.
A target of 45 to 50 per cent reductions from 2005 levels by 2035 represents no meaningful increase in ambition from Canadas current 2030 target. The 2035 target sets a marker to guide the next decade of climate action for all levels of government, industry, and Canadians. Targets matter. We know this decade is crucial.
Since the summer of 2021, five Republican-controlled state legislatures have passed bills banning their state governments from doing business with financial institutions that they allege have divested from fossilfuel companies as a result of ESG investment policies. Another six statehouses are considering similar bills.
Minnesotans are facing concurrent crises of climatechange, high energy prices and inflation, and the inequitable public health impacts of fossilfuel air pollution. Minnesota’s current goal is to reduce statewide carbon emissions 30 percent by 2025 compared to 2005 levels and 80 percent by 2050.
Though the case caught fewer headlines, it, too, threatened Earth-shifting implications all its own by thrusting into question a critical EPA lever for addressing climatechange. First and foremost, despite some fossilfuel interests swinging for the fossilfuel-favored fences, the Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v.
Supran and his colleagues compellingly summarize the research, concluding: “All told, ExxonMobil was aware of contemporary climate science, contributed to that science, and predicted future global warming correctly.” Such a constraint would clearly place a limit on the amount of fossilfuels ExxonMobil could extract, produce and market.
Despite adding six million more passenger cars, trucks, and SUVs to the roads over the last 10 years, California’s gasoline consumption has dropped over two billion gallons from its peak in 2005. Switching from fossilfuels like gasoline to increasingly clean electricity sources is vital for hitting climate and air pollution goals.
However, as we replace fossilfuels with clean electricity for heating and transportation to meet our climate goals, these peak demands will increasingly shift to the winter in many parts of the country. And this problem will only get worse as the impacts of climatechange become more frequent and severe.
This is in total opposition to the US commitment under the Paris Agreement to achieve a 50-52 percent emissions reduction below 2005 levels by 2030, and net-zero by 2050. These projections show that without additional policies or incentives, the US is very much in danger of not meeting our climate goals.
I dug into this complexity with my energy colleagues in the context of their recent analysis of pathways for how the US can meet its goals to cut heat-trapping emissions 50%-52% below 2005 levels by 2030, and achieve net zero emissions no later than 2050. That analysis assumed the U.S.
North Carolina today gets over half of its power from fossilfuels, about 25% from coal and 33% from natural gas. Nevertheless, the bill passed the state senate by a 42 to 7 vote and the state house by 90 to 20, before being signed by the Democratic governor. Solar is at 5% and wind is under 1l%.
Over the past year, precisely as our ability to identify the specific magnitude of action required to hit 2030 climate targets of 50-52 percent below 2005 levels has resolved into ever clearer view, the range of viable pathways for meeting those targets has consistently and considerably narrowed. No pivoting, just pivotal.
The impacts of climatechange are upon us, a consequence of over a century of global warming emissions from human activity. An average global temperature change greater than 1.5 Replacing petroleum with renewable electricity as the primary source of transportation energy will leave us all much better off. But is this affordable?
Last November, the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) released an interdisciplinary study exploring the various pathways to meeting US goals to cut heat-trapping emissions economywide 50 to 52 percent below 2005 levels by 2030 and achieve net-zero emissions no later than 2050. The good news?
Solar activity provides no alternative explanation for today’s climatechange Dagsvik and Moen claim that recent research indicates that variations in the sun’s magnetic field are of great importance for long-term fluctuations in solar activity. Our job is to be thorough and verify questionable results. It has taken time.
As with many environmental issues, when it comes to climatechange and reducing greenhouse gas emissions, this is no ordinary election. . For the past four years, Ontario has been failing on climatechange. Will your party commit to reducing the province’s greenhouse gas emissions by 60% from 2005 levels by 2030?
By expanding renewable power, phasing out fossilfuels, electrifying as much of the economy as possible, and deploying other technologies, the U.S. can achieve its climate goals by 2050—and a new report from UCS shows how. The average Seattle resident drove just 6,150 miles a year in 2018, 17% fewer than in 2005.
The new information shows that in 2021 GHG emissions were over eight per cent lower than in 2005. This reduction in emissions is a critical indicator of climate progress. However, to reach the federal government’s 2030 climate targets – a 40-45 per cent reduction from 2005 levels – significantly more reductions are needed.
In the 1960s climatechange was not really a significant concern, not even amongst environmentalists – this was despite the fact that the Swedish scientist Svante Arrhenius in 1896 was the first to claim that emissions from fossilfuels might eventually result in enhanced global warming. billion.
New demands for electricity and the need to reduce climate-changing emissions are driving new grid planning efforts. Smaller, decentralized growth in electric heat pumps for buildings, and electric transportation replacing fossilfuels also require more access to electricity and a modern grid.
Significantly warmer than usual surface temperatures in the Atlantic Ocean, which come largely as a result of human-caused climatechange. Fossilfuel-caused climatechange was a driving force in these storms, and despite the nearly perfect forecasts, we are still not ready for the effects of climatechange.
Ontario does have a target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 30 per cent below 2005 levels by 2030. And the Environment Ministry doesn’t have an updated climatechange plan for the province to follow, nor a timeframe to provide such a plan. Especially Ontario, which is the second most polluting province in Canada.
It was a sign of how much has changed since 2021 when the UK hosted the flagship COP26 UN climate summit with a promise “irrefutably to turn the tide and to begin the fightback against climatechange”. million has been given to pro-fossilfuel think tanks by Tory donors since the 2019 general election.
We are in the midst of a climate crisis – that much is certain. Gone are the days where the existence of human-caused climatechange could be debated. Emissions from the sector are rising; they have increased by nearly 20 per cent from 2005 levels. degrees Celsius. degrees Celsius.
Ebel, the CEO of Enbridge, to our list of infamous Climate Villains – powerful people with fossilfuel interests holding Canada back from effective climate action. The executives behind the fossilfuel industry often avoid public scrutiny, which is why we’re shining the spotlight on their activities.
Considering that the International Energy Agency, a global body of experts on energy, is asking oil and gas companies to reduce their emissions by 60 per cent by 2030 to avoid catastrophic climatechange, Canada’s target just doesn’t stack up. Canada’s climate ambition depends on a strong oil and gas emissions cap Parliament buildings.
It’s the interaction of the California LCFS with federal policy, particularly the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS), that has led to California’s renewable diesel boom. In its early years, between 2005 and 2010, the RFS helped launch the massive scaleup of corn ethanol that established 10 percent ethanol as the de facto standard for US gasoline.
ExxonMobil knew about – and denied – the links between fossilfuels and climatechange for decades and continues to gaslight people who challenge climate denial. NOVA was fined $550,000 more than two years after a 2005 spill of cancer-causing benzene from one of its plants near Sarnia, Ontario.
Pennsylvania won the International Envirothon competition in 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1994, 1997, 2000, 2001, 2003, 2005, 2009 and 2017 and frequently places in the top 10 finishers. Now more than 15,000 high school students across the state compete in 67 county Envirothons.
Despite publicly claiming support for climate action, the oil and gas companies along with CAPP have consistently pushed for the expansion of the fossilfuel industry, in direct opposition to the International Energy Agency’s call for a rapid phase out of fossilfuels.
Amidst historically low oil prices and economic shutdowns, fossilfuel companies continue to defend against lawsuits brought by state and local governments claiming climate-change related damages. Do State Nuisance Claims Related to ClimateChange Arise Under Federal Law? 308, 314 (2005)).
Yeti Crab The hairy yeti crab ( Kiwa hirsuta ) is a crustacean that was just discovered in 2005. It’s up to us to protect the unique wildlife in Antarctica in the face of the devastating effects of climatechange. The post 10 Fascinating Animals Found in Antarctica appeared first on Ocean Conservancy.
Among those contradictions is the need to wean society off fossilfuels versus the desire for short-term economic gain. Of note, the United Nations Framework on ClimateChange was adopted at the Rio Earth Summit in 1992 with the goal of preventing dangerous human influence in the Earth’s climate system.
Plus, climate targets help us hold governments and businesses accountable for their actions. What are Canada’s climate targets? Back in 2021 , the Government of Canada set a target for 2030: to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 40 – 45 per cent below 2005 levels.
To no one’s surprise it contained zero funding to address climatechange – not even for clean energy – which the document referred to multiple times. As a result, between 2005 and 2017 greenhouse gas pollution from Ontario’s electricity system dropped by 93 per cent. It is not. It will be something to watch.
For the target to ensure oil and gas companies are doing their part, it must increase to at least align with Canada’s national emissions reduction target, which is a 40–45 per cent reduction from 2005 levels by 2030. The federal government must stand firm in the face of the unreasonable opposition it will inevitably receive.
The Premier had made it very clear in past statements that she is biased against renewable energy, and instead favours projects that cause pollution, limit Alberta’s future economic growth, and contribute to global climatechange. In 2023, Alberta led the country in renewable energy investment.
ExxonMobil knew about — and denied — the links between fossilfuels and climatechange for decades and gaslights people who challenge climate denial. NOVA was fined $550,000 more than two years after a 2005 spill of cancer-causing benzene from one of its plants near Sarnia, Ontario.
The escalating costs of damages from extreme weather events, many exacerbated by climatechange, makes poignant a question with a serious price tag: who will be on the hook to pay for climate damages? These leaks are only a fraction of the 90,000 barrels spilled in Louisiana in 2005 after Hurricane Katrina.
Were spotlighting Micheal Binnion, the Mastermind of Petro Populism, who has worked for decades to embed support for fossilfuels in the highest levels of the Canadian government. This series of satirical CVs for climate villains has helped reveal the names and faces of the corporate elite championing the fossilfuel industry.
By Hilary Mercer , Shell Polymers/Pennsylvania Chemicals Project & Kevin Walker, President/CEO Duquesne Light This guest essay first appeared on TribLive.com May 11, 2022 -- Climatechange demands that the world, including our region, transition its energy profile to a low-carbon one.
DEP’s ClimateChange Advisory Committee is scheduled to meet August 24 to review the latest Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventory for Pennsylvania and hear an overview of DEP’s Energy Office Clean Energy Program Plan. The Inventory had shown a steady decrease from 2005 through 2016 from 289.62 million tons in 2005 to 73.09
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content