category congress 
The Energy Law Blog
JUNE 2, 2020
1331 because the cities’ claims were “necessarily governed by federal common law.” Do State Nuisance Claims Related to Climate Change Arise Under Federal Law? the district court found that the Plaintiffs’ claims supported federal question jurisdiction because those state-law claims were “necessarily governed by federal common law.”
Legal Planet
OCTOBER 5, 2023
Previously, I taught law school, practiced solo, worked in the Appellate Section of the Justice Department’s Environmental and Natural Resources Division – and way back, I, like you, had the great honor of clerking for Justice Stevens. Maybe we could start by having you say a bit about yourself and your role in the Texas case.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Arnold Porter
AUGUST 26, 2021
In the first complaint, the Center alleged that a chemical manufacturer and importer headquartered in Akron, Ohio, had failed to report 843,047 pounds of tetrabromobisphenol A bis(2,3-dibromopropyl ether) and five other substances that it imported during the 2013–2015 reporting period. The House bill ( H.R. 33926 (June 28, 2021).]]
Vermont Law
FEBRUARY 25, 2018
This post is part of the Environmental Law Review Syndicate, a multi-school online forum run by student editors from the nation’s leading environmental law reviews. . The report breaks down these investments into four categories. The report also notes that “RGGI investments in 2015 are estimated to return $2.31
Arnold Porter
JUNE 2, 2021
Law §§ 35-0105, 37-0115.]]. ” The Fifth Circuit concluded that the consideration of costs was not required for the prohibition on products containing the other four phthalates because Congress had not added a “reasonable” qualifier to that standard. The Senate passed the PFAS Act in the 116th Congress ( S.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
52 
Let's personalize your content