category supreme-court 
Legal Planet
JUNE 30, 2022
I want to focus on the disingenuous way the Supreme Court deals with a previous ruling, and its implications for states. In 2011, in AEP v. Section 111 of the Act directs the EPA Administrator to list “categories of stationary sources” that “in [her] judgment. 410 (2011). 7411(b)(1)(B); see also §7411(a)(2).
Law Columbia
NOVEMBER 1, 2016
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. West Virginia Federal Court Ordered EPA to Evaluate Clean Air Act’s Impacts on Coal Industry. and non-U.S. climate litigation charts. Pritzker , Nos. opinion Oct.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Law Columbia
JANUARY 10, 2019
The CEQA Guidelines have been revised to clarify the appropriate methodology for measuring and assessing the significance of GHG emissions, consistent with recent case law. These new requirements are consistent with the California Supreme Court’s decision in Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth v. 4th 455 (2d.
CEQA Developments
MARCH 3, 2021
With respect to my second reason, CEQA is generally an active area of law in terms of appellate cases, new legislation, and other significant developments; keeping track of the published – i.e., most important – cases is a big enough task without worrying about the even greater number of non-precedential unpublished ones.
The Energy Law Blog
MAY 17, 2011
By Lesley Foxhall Pietras On April 27, 2011, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. 24479, 24479 (May 2, 2011). Public comment on the proposed guidance must be received on or before July 1, 2011. Army Corps of Engineers, 531 U.S. 159 (2001) (SWANCC) and Rapanos v. Guidance at 2.
Law Columbia
JUNE 8, 2021
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. In Baltimore’s Climate Case Against Fossil Fuel Companies, Supreme Court Held that Appellate Review of Remand Order Extends to All Grounds for Removal.
Law Columbia
JULY 2, 2021
Each month, Arnold & Porter and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. Louisiana Federal Court Blocked Biden Administration “Pause” on New Oil and Gas Leases. and non-U.S. climate litigation charts. FEATURED CASE.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
130 
Let's personalize your content