category government-administration 
E2 Law Blog
MAY 26, 2023
715 (2006), and embraced ever since in a series of rulemakings and jurisdictional determinations by the EPA and the U.S. Finally, it states that a third category (category C), consisting of wetlands “adjacent” to traditional navigable waters, is “includ[ed]” within B. United States , 547 U. at (slip op. at (slip op.
CEQA Developments
MAY 2, 2023
DWR’s efforts in this regard took place from 2001 to 2006, involving “five federal agencies, five state agencies, seven local government entities, five Native American tribes, four local water agencies, and 13 nongovernmental organizations,” with three years of hearings and two years of negotiations. 791a et seq.).
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Law Columbia
JULY 6, 2017
Each month, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP (APKS) and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. Circuit Vacated EPA’s Administrative Stay of Methane Standards for Oil and Gas Facilities. and non-U.S. climate litigation charts.
Arnold Porter
DECEMBER 20, 2021
This Advisory provides an update on several recently issued US Food and Drug Administration (FDA or the Agency) draft guidance documents and advice addressing areas of increased attention. They should have agreements in place to ensure that any RWD owned by a third-party may be provided to FDA for inspection.[[N:While ”[[N:Id.
CEQA Developments
OCTOBER 21, 2021
After briefing and argument, the trial court denied the requested writ relief, finding McCann failed to exhaust administrative remedies prior to seeking judicial review of the Exempt Projects, and failed to demonstrate that substantial evidence supported a fair argument that the MND Projects may have a significant environmental impact.
Vermont Law
FEBRUARY 25, 2018
This post is part of the Environmental Law Review Syndicate, a multi-school online forum run by student editors from the nation’s leading environmental law reviews. . The government sets an overall emissions target¾the cap¾and determines which facilities will be covered. Cap-and-trade programs generally operate as follows. [13].
Legal Planet
FEBRUARY 7, 2024
For instance, under the Court’s reasoning, a Reagan Administration regulation as a blatantly illegal environmentalist overreach. Five Justices (four dissenters plus Justiice Kennedy) support the “significant nexus” test, which the lower courts generally view as binding law. Here’s a timeline of the major events. In Rapanos v.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
52 
Let's personalize your content