category migratory-bird 2006 Related Topics 
Law Columbia
JULY 6, 2017
The plaintiffs in lawsuits challenging the cap-and-trade program had argued that it was not authorized by the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 and that the requirement to purchase emissions allowances constituted a tax that required approval by a two-thirds majority of the State legislature.
The Energy Law Blog
MAY 17, 2011
715 (2006). In SWANCC, the Supreme Court addressed the question of CWA jurisdiction over isolated, non-navigable, intrastate ponds, and concluded that CWA jurisdiction could not be based solely on the presence of migratory birds. Army Corps of Engineers, 531 U.S. 159 (2001) (SWANCC) and Rapanos v. United States, 547 U.S.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Legal Planet
FEBRUARY 7, 2024
A footnote explains that this category includes “”all other waters of the United States that could be regulated under the federal government’s Constitutional powers to regulate and protect interstate commerce.” Supreme Court strikes down a rule covers any wetland or pond used by migratory birds. President George H.W.
ESA
NOVEMBER 22, 2021
EPA unveiled a proposed rule that would take the Navigable Waters Protection Rule off the books and reinstate long-standing regulations defining which streams and wetlands are subject to federal protection, a category known as “Waters of the U.S.,” NOAA NMFS – Call for Nominations for the Atlantic Highly Migratory Species Advisory Panel.
ESA
JUNE 14, 2021
By October, Interior says it will complete its revocation of a controversial late Trump-era rule weakening protections for migratory birds. The racist legacy many birds carry – The Washington Post. Odds and ends: EPA says it will reconsider a 2020 Trump regulation known as the Major MACT to Area, or MM2A, rule.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
40 
Let's personalize your content