Remove Endangered Species Act Remove Law Remove Natural Resources
article thumbnail

Thoughts on AB 131

Legal Planet

The changes are focused on facilitating development where it is on net beneficial to the environment, and not in places where it would harm important natural resources. It includes conservation easements and state parks – lands that should not be available for development because of property law limits on development in any case.

article thumbnail

The Deal With Dicamba: EPA Proposes Unconditional Registration for Over-the-Top Use

National Law Center

Environmental plaintiffs filed a lawsuit against EPA, claiming that its 2016 registration decision violated both the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (“FIFRA”) and the Endangered Species Act (“EPA”). FIFRA is the primary federal law regulating pesticide use in the United States.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

ESA Legislative Update

Endangered Species Law

The Committee on Natural Resources (Committee) in the U.S. House of Representatives is considering a number of bills regarding wildlife, including bills to reauthorize the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA). The Committee held a hearing on this bill on March 25.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of NEPA Review

National Law Center

Additionally, the Supreme Court found that when considering whether an agency’s NEPA report complies with the law, reviewing courts should grant “substantial deference” to the agency. National Environmental Policy Act NEPA was signed into law on January 1, 1970.

article thumbnail

The Feed: Vol. 3, Issue 14

National Law Center

The Ag & Food Law Update > Search Site Navigation About the Center Professional Staff Partners Research by Topic Center Publications Webinar Series State Compilations Farm Bill Resources Ag Law Bibliography Ag Law Glossary Ag Law Reporter General Resources 24 Jul The Feed: Vol.

article thumbnail

Federal Court Finds Swampbuster Constitutional

National Law Center

However, the court disagreed, concluding that Swampbuster is a valid exercise of Congress’s spending power and that the law should be upheld. Swampbuster is implemented by the USDA’s Natural Resources Conservation Service (“NRCS”). 5 U.S.C. § To determine whether the plaintiff in CTM Holdings, LLC v.

article thumbnail

Protecting the Lesser Prairie-Chicken on Private Land in a Shifting Regulatory Environment

Acoel

The focus is whether the declining bird should be listed and protected under the federal Endangered Species Act, and what conservation measures should be required of developers that impact the species’ habitat. The outcome of the debate will have implications for many other imperiled species. In 2022, the U.S.