category nepa Endangered Species Act Related Topics 
ESA
JUNE 14, 2021
US Fish and Wildlife Service reverses Endangered Species Act rules. NEPA: The Council on Environmental Quality has a three-step plan related to the National Environmental Policy Act rules, which guide federal permitting decisions and other actions. Executive Branch. International.
Law Columbia
SEPTEMBER 15, 2020
Before a federal agency can issue such a permit it must comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”), issuing either an environmental impact statement or a determination that a full review is not needed. These permitting decisions may then subject transmission lines to NEPA, among other statutes. .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Law Columbia
NOVEMBER 1, 2016
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a district court decision that vacated the listing of the Beringia distinct population segment (DPS) of the Pacific bearded seal subspecies as “threatened” under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). S ierra Club Enumerated Shortcomings in Department of Energy NEPA Review for LNG Exports.
ESA
FEBRUARY 28, 2022
Supreme Court rejects Dakota Access NEPA battle – E&E News. EPA – Proposed Stipulated Partial Settlement Agreement, Endangered Species Act Claims. Readout of White House Climate Science Roundtable on Countering “Delayism” and Communicating the Urgency of Climate Action – White House. States and Tribes.
Law Columbia
JULY 6, 2017
The court agreed with the magistrate’s conclusion that the plaintiffs failed to state a claim for violation of a nondiscretionary duty under the Endangered Species Act and that the court therefore lacked jurisdiction. The government also asserted that the MBTA and Eagle Act claims were barred by controlling precedent.
Law Columbia
MARCH 6, 2018
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a district court decision that vacated the listing of the Arctic ringed seal as threatened under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The court ruled, however, that the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) did not require additional climate change analysis. AquAlliance v.
Law Columbia
JUNE 8, 2021
Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) did not sufficiently explain why it reversed a previous determination that the Pacific walrus qualified for listing as endangered or threatened under the Endangered Species Act. May 24, 2021). Federal Court Upheld Environmental Review for Forest Thinning Project. Conservation Congress v.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
98 
Let's personalize your content