Remove Carbon Emissions Remove Conservation Remove Government Remove Greenhouse
article thumbnail

Ranking Presidents on Climate Change

Legal Planet

In 1983, Reagan’s EPA warned about the risk of a runaway greenhouse effect. played a crucial role in negotiating the Kyoto Protocol, which required developed countries to cut their carbon emissions 5% below 1990 levels. Bush’s double-dealing As a presidential candidate, Bush endorsed a cap-and-trade system for carbon emissions.

article thumbnail

Penn State Creates Task Force To Significantly Reduce University's Carbon Emissions

PA Environment Daily

Over the last 15 years, Penn State University has cut its carbon emissions by more than 35 percent, putting the University ahead of schedule to meet its goal of reducing greenhouse gas outputs to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. The University has been a leader in dramatically reducing its greenhouse gas footprint.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Wasting Gas

Legal Planet

The rule will be good for everyone except the oil and gas operators who waste the gas, increasing methane and carbon emissions while giving the public nothing in return. Venting releases methane (CH 4 ), a powerful greenhouse gas. Flaring results in carbon (CO 2 ) emissions, but with no offsetting public benefit from using it.

Waste 235
article thumbnail

The Winding Path of Australian Climate Policy

Legal Planet

On a per capita basis, Australia’s carbon emissions are even higher than the United States. In the past two years, however, the things have started trending upward after years of inaction by conservative governments. As in the United States, state governments made some effort to pick up the slack. As in the U.S.,

2030 239
article thumbnail

The Supreme Court’s Top-10 Environmental Law Decisions

Legal Planet

Initially, Chevron was hailed by conservative judges and commentators. Morton opened the door for environmental groups to sue over government actions, something that Justice Scalia had opposed since his days as a law professor. The case involved EPA’s power to regulate greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide under the Clean Air Act.

Law 147
article thumbnail

What’s Up With the Supreme Court?

Law and Environment

EPA , which challenges EPA’s authority to regulate greenhouse gases, and Sackett v. Of course, the EEI did so to ensure that the Clean Air Act continues to act as a shield against private tort actions over carbon emissions, but still. It’s difficult to call this Court conservative. Good luck with that.

article thumbnail

U.S. Counts on “Climate-Smart” Farms to Slow Global Warming

Circle of Blue

By Keith Schneider, Circle of Blue – April 5, 2023 For decades, leading US farm leaders likened efforts to rein in harmful climate change as attacks on agriculture itself, aligning with oil and gas industry groups to block policies aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions. greenhouse gases. agriculture.