Remove 2013 Remove Carbon Emissions Remove Clean Air Act Remove Clean Water Act
article thumbnail

May 2020 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

Columbia Climate Law

The court said that having remanded to the Corps for consultation under the Endangered Species Act, it was not necessary to determine whether the Corps “made a fully informed and well-considered decision” under NEPA and the Clean Water Act.

2020 40
article thumbnail

November 2017 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

Law Columbia

Murray Energy Sought Supreme Court Review of Fourth Circuit’s Dismissal of Clean Air Act Jobs Study Case. Circuit case regarding FERC’s obligation to consider greenhouse gas emissions in the environmental review for a pipeline rendered FERC’s review of the Valley Lateral Project insufficient. Foster , No. decision Sept.

2017 40
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

February 2020 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

Law Columbia

Washington Supreme Court Invalidated Regulation of Indirect Greenhouse Gas Emissions. The Washington Supreme Court concluded that the Washington Clean Air Act did not grant the Department of Ecology authority to regulate indirect greenhouse gas emissions of businesses and utilities whose products ultimately generate such emissions.

2020 40
article thumbnail

ESA Policy News: August 16, 2021

ESA

Advances in attribution science since the last report was issued in 2013 have allowed experts to connect individual events to climate change with more certainty. Top Priorities : Conservation; drought and forest management to reduce carbon emissions and prevent wildfires. Stabenow’s “Growing Climate Solutions Act,” S.

2021 98