2011 Carbon Dioxide Clean Air Act Government 
Legal Planet
JUNE 30, 2022
In 2011, in AEP v. CT , the Supreme Court said this: We hold that the Clean Air Act and the EPA actions it authorizes displace any federal common law right to seek abatement of carbon-dioxide emissions from fossil-fuel fired power plants. 410 (2011). at 528–529. Connecticut , 564 U. Post, at 20.
Legal Planet
JULY 12, 2023
Except in this case, it appears she helped tie the department’s hands: According to the Daily Montanan , Nowakowski herself drafted the original 2011 MEPA limitation for a state senator. Their attorneys argue that the court could bring “immediate redress” for their psychological injuries.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
The Energy Law Blog
SEPTEMBER 20, 2013
By Jillian Marullo House Bill 788, signed into law on June 14, 2013, authorizes the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (“TCEQ”) to regulate emissions of carbon dioxide and five other greenhouse gases (“GHG”) “[t]o the extent that greenhouse gas emissions require authorization under federal law.”
Law Columbia
NOVEMBER 1, 2016
The ESA does not require more, and NMFS did not act arbitrarily or capriciously in concluding that the effects of global climate change on sea ice would endanger the Beringia DPS in the foreseeable future.” The plan must specifically address how EPA will consider the effects of Clean Air Act regulation on the coal industry.
Columbia Climate Law
MAY 8, 2020
The court rejected the argument that a more recently enacted statute governing rate structure conflicted with and preempted the 1980 statute. The plaintiffs asserted claims under the National Environmental Policy Act, the Clean Air Act, the Administrative Procedure Act, and Corps regulations. B296547 (Cal.
Law Columbia
JULY 2, 2021
The third-party complaint asserted that while the plaintiffs’ claims were meritless, Statoil, “as well as potentially the many other sovereign governments that use and promote fossil fuels,” must be joined as third-party defendants. The ACE Rule replaced the Obama administration’s Clean Power Plan. In re Enbridge Energy, LP , Nos.
PA Environment Daily
JULY 25, 2022
And today, we're gonna hear from the ethics of work of EHP on how our state government has failed to defend, to protect our children and the citizens of Pennsylvania from this real problem. There are public health protections baked into government policies and practices.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
130 
Let's personalize your content