This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
It was a bitter cold day on January 5, 2018, and Massachusetts Governor Charlie Baker had no choice. Demand for electricity was high, but there was not enough gas available to keep all the gas-fired power plants running. This would leave people without power in the frigid temperatures.
gigawatt (GW) wind farm, Hollandse Kust Zuid, which is scheduled for completion next year. The flagship wind farm made headlines as the operator, Swedens’s Vattenfall in 2018 won the concession to build it without government subsidy. The Netherlands plans to connect more than 20 GW of windpower before 2030.
We all know that to successfully address climate change we need to phase out fossilfuels and switch to electric power. A s we transition our homes and vehicles to electric power, it’s imperative that the electricity sector be clean. The costs of wind and solar power have been dropping like a stone.
Offshore wind cuts power plant pollution Harnessing abundant offshore wind can bring real benefits for cutting pollution and improving public health. The use of fossilfuels in the power sector, via gas, coal, and oil plants, is a major source of pollutants that harm people and communities.
Perhaps predictably, the large energy companies NextERA and Calpine oppose it, and are funding the opposition: the companies own fossilfuel and other power plants that will become less economical, and stand to lose many millions when the less expensive hydropower enters the grid.
Investor-owned utilities want to protect the bottom line of their fossilfuelpower plants and stave off competition from low-cost renewables that would be aided by transmission, even if those cleaner solutions would help ratepayers and boost grid reliability.
The other is to improve the energy structure, replacing fossilfuel sources with alternatives. tonnes of CO2 in 2018. It has huge potential for renewables, with vast areas of sparsely populated land and plenty of wind and sun. Neither of these will be easy for Inner Mongolia.
With 2,800 MW installed and operating by 2040, offshore wind would provide more than half of Maine’s electricity demand, even if the state’s demand more than doubled as the state moves to replace fossilfuels with clean electricity for transportation and heating.
In 2018, the city of Bowling Green contracted Bowen Research to produce a housing needs assessment that found that the city’s poverty rate was well above state and national averages, with over 15,000 people and over one-fourth of all children in the city living in poverty. Crisis on top of a crisis.
The plaintiffs alleged that Peabody (and a number of other fossilfuel companies) caused greenhouse gas emissions that resulted in sea level rise and damage to their property. The rule took effect on January 17, 2017; on June 15, 2017, BLM issued a notice of postponement of January 17, 2018 compliance dates. filed Oct.
The IPCC’s 2018 Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5 But a major question is whether Manchin, a backer of fossilfuels, will go along with an effort that could eventually lead to less coal production in West Virginia. He has proposed paying for the new breaks by ending fossilfuel subsidies. 13, 2021.
Supreme Court denied fossilfuel companies’ petition for writ of certiorari seeking review of the Ninth Circuit’s decision reversing the district court’s 2018 denial of Oakland’s and San Francisco’s motions to remand their climate change nuisance cases to California state court. On June 14, 2021, the U.S. Chevron Corp.
While it is unsurprising that his policy priorities will reflect his long-standing antipathy toward climate protections and renewables not to mention the fossilfuel industrys financial support during his campaign his attempt to frame this policy by declaring a national energy emergency is beyond disingenuous.
Finally, a word on the stark choice America is faced with now embrace a clean energy future or double down on the fossilfuel industries of the past. He has long railed against windpower (both onshore and offshore), and he repeated many of these claims at his post-Inauguration rally at the Capital One Center on January 20, 2025.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content