Remove 2012 Remove Climate Scientist Remove Paris Agreement Remove Regulations
article thumbnail

October 2019 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

Law Columbia

The court found that a 2012 no-jeopardy determination was unsupported, arbitrary, and capricious because it did not account for the owl’s recovery. Court Dismissed Counterclaims in Climate Scientist’s Defamation Lawsuit. 2012 CA 008263 B (D.C. s anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) statute­—i.e.,

2019 40
article thumbnail

August 2021 Updates to the Climate Case Charts

Law Columbia

The court rejected Berkeley’s jurisdictional grounds for dismissal (standing and ripeness) but found that the association failed to demonstrate that EPCA expressly preempted Berkeley’s ordinance because the ordinance “does not directly regulate either energy use or energy efficiency of covered appliances.” 2012 CA 008263 B (D.C.

2021 40
article thumbnail

Ask a Scientist: In Moments of Despair, Climate Progress Can Keep Hope Alive

Union of Concerned Scientists

To get an assessment of the progress thus far, as well as an idea if what has to happen next, I turned to two of my colleagues in the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) Climate & Energy Program: Principal Climate Scientist Rachel Licker and Transmission Policy Manager Sam Gomberg. How cool is that?