Law Columbia

JULY 6, 2017

Each month, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP (APKS) and the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law collect and summarize developments in climate-related litigation, which we also add to our U.S. A number of different parties had lined up on either side of the issue of whether EPA’s stay was lawful. and non-U.S. United States , No.

2017 40

2017 Clean Air Act Climate Change Renewable Energy 40

The Energy Law Blog

MAY 17, 2011

715 (2006). In SWANCC, the Supreme Court addressed the question of CWA jurisdiction over isolated, non-navigable, intrastate ponds, and concluded that CWA jurisdiction could not be based solely on the presence of migratory birds. Army Corps of Engineers, 531 U.S. 159 (2001) (SWANCC) and Rapanos v. United States, 547 U.S.

Clean Water Act 40

Clean Water Act 2011 2001 2006 40

Legal Planet

FEBRUARY 7, 2024

A footnote explains that this category includes “”all other waters of the United States that could be regulated under the federal government’s Constitutional powers to regulate and protect interstate commerce.” Supreme Court strikes down a rule covers any wetland or pond used by migratory birds. In Rapanos v.

Clean Water Act 257

Clean Water Act 2006 2001 Regulations 257

ESA

NOVEMBER 22, 2021

EPA unveiled a proposed rule that would take the Navigable Waters Protection Rule off the books and reinstate long-standing regulations defining which streams and wetlands are subject to federal protection, a category known as “Waters of the U.S.,” or WOTUS. “In United States. 2225 ) this past summer.

2021 105

2021 Conservation Endangered Species Act Climate Change 105

ESA

JUNE 14, 2021

By October, Interior says it will complete its revocation of a controversial late Trump-era rule weakening protections for migratory birds. The agenda notes DOE is preparing a major rulemaking to reduce the use of fossil fuels in federal buildings — an implementation of a 2007 law. International.

2021 98

2021 Endangered Species Act Ocean Climate Change 98