This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The earthquake and tsunami had a great impact on Japanese energy policy, leading to the shutdown of nuclearpower plants for safety reasons. The citizens in the Kobe case argue that the aggravation of climate change and airpollution by the new power plants violate their rights.
The Paris Climate Agreement seemed well-positioned to join the 1963 Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (halting atomic explosions above ground that contaminated the atmosphere) and the 1987 Montreal Protocol (ending use of chemicals that damaged the ozone layer) as one of the three most significant environmental treaties ever negotiated.
Backgrounds After the Great East Japan Earthquake in 2011, all nuclearpower plants in Japan were temporarily shutdown due to safety concerns. Kobelco Power Kobe No. and Kansai Electric Power Co., and requested an injunction to block the construction and subsequent operation of two coal-fired power plants.
But the country changed course as a result of the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake and Tsunami, which led to the forced shutdown of nuclearpower plants and greater reliance on fossil fuels. As of May 2022 , there are 163 operating coal-fired power plants in Japan. As a result, Japan’s CO 2 emissions increased, peaking in 2013.
India has stated that its planned coal-fired power plants may not be needed. Quartz reports that the Land of the Morning Calm has seen its coal-burning recently increase as its nuclearpower plants faced problems and as coal supplied the necessary power. The country has 53 coal-fired plants.
Background Immediately after the Fukushima nuclear accident in 2011, all nuclearpower plants in Japan were shut down. The Japanese government recognized the urgent need to secure power supply and implemented some measures to expedite the construction of new power plant.
If elected governor, Graham says Florida would stick with Paris climate accord. . EPA: airpollution rule should be delayed – despite its effect on children. Federal court blocks Trump EPA on airpollution. Obama praises Paris climate deal despite Trump's withdrawal. 2017.06.14. 2017.06.14. 2017.06.14.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 12,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content