Remove 2007 Remove Paris Agreement Remove Radiation
article thumbnail

A distraction due to errors, misunderstanding and misguided Norwegian statistics

Real Climate

In other words, the claim shows a lack of knowledge and is a well-known old argument that I commented on Realclimate.org in 2007. In 2013, there was a report in the Guardian about scientific studies that refuted the opinion that solar activity or cosmic radiation should explain climate change. See for instance Benestad (2016).

article thumbnail

The ITLOS Advisory Opinion and Marine Geoengineering: More Questions, Few Answers

Law Columbia

The second category of marine geoengineering activities, known as solar radiation management or modification (SRM), do not directly target GHGs. Marine geoengineering first came to the attention of the international community in 2007, when a U.S.-based But that term continues to be widely used in international discussions.

article thumbnail

What Happens If EPA Revokes the Endangerment Finding?

Legal Planet

C limit the global community committed to in the Paris Agreement, adopted in 2015. In 2007, the Supreme Court held in Massachusetts v EPA that the term pollutant includes the greenhouse gases that are warming the globe. And the consequences of reversing the endangerment finding will decimate EPA’s regulations.