Remove category supreme-court
article thumbnail

What power does the state have over land-use regulation in California?

Legal Planet

A big court ruling in California land-use law happened last month – and it has really large implications for the state’s efforts to address California’s housing crisis. CARLA appealed to the Court of Appeal, which reversed the trial court’s decision and sent the project back to the city to consider consistent with the HAA.

article thumbnail

Catch 22 at the Supreme Court

Legal Planet

I want to focus on the disingenuous way the Supreme Court deals with a previous ruling, and its implications for states. Massachusetts made plain that emissions of carbon dioxide qualify as air pollution subject to regulation under the Act. EPA , the Supreme Court said this: The dissent also cites our decision in American Elec.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

The Illusions of Takings Law

Legal Planet

For the last century, the Supreme Court has tried to operationalize the idea that a government regulation can be so burdensome that it amounts to a seizure of property. No, that’s not quite the language the Court used.) The Court will undoubtedly have to do more fine tuning of its definition of physical invasions.

Law 181
article thumbnail

Post-Sackett Wetland Delineation Process Raises Questions

Ohio Environmental Law

EPA issued the rule to conform its regulations to the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court in Sackett v. Following the Supreme Court’s decision in SWANCC v. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) with regarding delineating all wetlands in Ohio, both federally regulated and isolated wetlands.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court Issues Decision Sharply Limiting Clean Water Act Jurisdiction over Wetlands

E2 Law Blog

Sometimes the most monumental Supreme Court decisions spring from the most modest facts. Thus began nearly two decades of litigation, culminating in the Supreme Court’s May 25, 2023 decision in Sackett v. The Court next examines state dredge and fill permitting authority under Section 404(g) of the CWA, 33 U.S.C.

article thumbnail

30 Environmental Practice Attorneys Recognized in The Legal 500 U.S. and LATAM 2023 Guides

E2 Law Blog

Brill Industry Focus > Energy > Energy Regulation: Oil and Gas Orange County Diedre A. DeTore Industry Focus > Energy Regulation: Electric Power Boston Dominic E. Draye Dispute Resolution > Appellate: Courts of Appeals Dispute Resolution > Appellate: Supreme Courts (States and Federal) Washington DC Jared E.

2023 52
article thumbnail

Wetlands Protection Update

Smith Enviorment

Supreme Court decision reducing federal Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction over streams and wetlands. Supreme Court also interpreted the Clean Water Act to apply only to wetlands that have a continuous surface connection to water bodies otherwise in federal jurisdiction. October 30, 2023. In Sackett , the U.S.