Remove category court-decisions
article thumbnail

What power does the state have over land-use regulation in California?

Legal Planet

A big court ruling in California land-use law happened last month – and it has really large implications for the state’s efforts to address California’s housing crisis. CARLA appealed to the Court of Appeal, which reversed the trial court’s decision and sent the project back to the city to consider consistent with the HAA.

article thumbnail

Catch 22 at the Supreme Court

Legal Planet

I want to focus on the disingenuous way the Supreme Court deals with a previous ruling, and its implications for states. CT , the Supreme Court said this: We hold that the Clean Air Act and the EPA actions it authorizes displace any federal common law right to seek abatement of carbon-dioxide emissions from fossil-fuel fired power plants.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

The Illusions of Takings Law

Legal Planet

For the last century, the Supreme Court has tried to operationalize the idea that a government regulation can be so burdensome that it amounts to a seizure of property. The Court’s decision last week in Cedar Point Nursery v. No, that’s not quite the language the Court used.) Hassid illustrates both points.

Law 181
article thumbnail

Global AI Regulation: Canadian Edition

Arnold Porter

However, the AIDA leaves many of the details of the requirements to the federal government to specify in future regulations, which might lead to a more burdensome regime. If passed, the AIDA would govern private-sector “regulated activities” regarding AI systems.

article thumbnail

Post-Sackett Wetland Delineation Process Raises Questions

Ohio Environmental Law

EPA issued the rule to conform its regulations to the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court in Sackett v. See, prior post discussing Sackett) The Court limited federal jurisdiction to only wetlands that are adjacent to navigable waters and those with a continuous surface connection to relatively permanent waters adjoining navigable waters.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court Issues Decision Sharply Limiting Clean Water Act Jurisdiction over Wetlands

E2 Law Blog

Sometimes the most monumental Supreme Court decisions spring from the most modest facts. Thus began nearly two decades of litigation, culminating in the Supreme Court’s May 25, 2023 decision in Sackett v. The Court next examines state dredge and fill permitting authority under Section 404(g) of the CWA, 33 U.S.C.

article thumbnail

Wetlands Protection Update

Smith Enviorment

Supreme Court decision reducing federal Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction over streams and wetlands. This post provides an update on federal implementation of the Sackett decision and new information on the impact of the wetlands provision in the N.C. Federal Implementation of the decision in Sackett v. In Sackett v.