Remove judicial cases
article thumbnail

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Clarifies “Cat’s Paw” and “Stray Remarks” Doctrines in Employment Discrimination Cases

Law and Environment

Key Takeaways: On June 21, 2023, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (“SJC”) issued a ruling in Mark A. The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court’s (“SJC”) decision in Mark A. Schneider Electric USA, Inc. , Schneider Electric USA, Inc. ,

2017 100
article thumbnail

CEQA Case Report: Understanding the Judicial Landscape for Development

Clean Energy Law

2018 Year in Review: Public agencies prevailed in 65% of CEQA cases analyzed. Over the course of 2018, Latham & Watkins lawyers reviewed all 57 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) cases, both published and unpublished, that came before California appellate courts. Figure 1 ( above ) shows all 57 cases sorted by topic.

2017 130
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Roundup: EPA Releases Several Rules and a Draft Scientific Integrity Policy

Union of Concerned Scientists

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in several cases that could severely hamper agencies’ ability to regulate based on evidence and expertise. The related cases Loper Bright Enterprises v. Plaintiffs in this case argue that the clock should instead start when an entity first experiences harm. EPA decision in 2022.

article thumbnail

Judicial Activism and Climate Change: An Unhealthy Combination

Legal Planet

In a previous round of the lawsuit, the Ninth Circuit told her to dismiss the case because she lacked the power to require creation of a federal plan to prevent climate change. This is no time to jettison the limits on judicial power — not in an era when the rule of law and of democracy themselves are in such peril.

article thumbnail

The Children’s Crusade

Legal Planet

I know their hearts are in the right place, but I wish they had thought twice about filing this case. It’s probably enough to say that the case would certainly go to the Supreme Court, with its conservative supermajority. But that is not really what the judicial process is meant for. It has no apparent chance of success.

article thumbnail

Reviewing Agency Indecision

Legal Planet

A case decided by the Third Circuit last week is important for two reasons. That brings me to the intriguing procedural wrinkle in the case. Normally, FERC’s failure to decide wouldn’t be subject to judicial review. It clarifies an important procedural issue applying to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).

article thumbnail

More Thrills and Chills Ahead!  What to Expect in 2024

Legal Planet

The Court is hearing two related cases that raise the issue of whether Chevron should be discarded or sharply limited, transferring power from agencies to judges. Anti-regulatory conservatives favored this doctrine in the Reagan days, but not so much since Democrats showed their own ability to make use of this agency discretion.

2024 260