en Blogs authors 
Frontiers
APRIL 26, 2022
Image credit: TJM Arseneau-Robar, KA Anderson, EN Vasey, P Sicotte, JA Teichroeb. Rather, the vervet’s planning proved to depend on “complex, multifactor decisions that consider a great deal of contextual information,” the authors wrote. Image credit: TJM Arseneau-Robar, KA Anderson, EN Vasey, P Sicotte, JA Teichroeb.
The Energy Law Blog
OCTOBER 2, 2020
1447(d) limited its review of the district court’s remand order to only those grounds which were based on the energy companies acting under the authority of a federal officer. The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state regarding a particular matter.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
The Energy Law Blog
NOVEMBER 18, 2020
Maintaining that the plaintiff qualified as a seaman under controlling Fifth Circuit precedent but questioning that precedent in light of Supreme Court case law, the panel urged the Fifth Circuit to review the case en banc. Thus, the panel recommended taking the case en banc to “bring our jurisprudence in line with Supreme Court caselaw.”
The Energy Law Blog
NOVEMBER 18, 2020
Maintaining that the plaintiff qualified as a seaman under controlling Fifth Circuit precedent but questioning that precedent in light of Supreme Court case law, the panel urged the Fifth Circuit to review the case en banc. Thus, the panel recommended taking the case en banc to “bring our jurisprudence in line with Supreme Court caselaw.”
The Energy Law Blog
MAY 17, 2019
1442 authorized removal to federal court of a suit against a federal officer “only when the state suit was ‘ for any act under color of such office.’” Under that rule, a 3-member panel may not overturn a prior panel “absent an intervening change in law, such as by statutory amendment, or the Supreme Court, or the en banc Court.”
The Energy Law Blog
OCTOBER 2, 2020
1447(d) limited its review of the district court’s remand order to only those grounds which were based on the energy companies acting under the authority of a federal officer. The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state regarding a particular matter.
The Energy Law Blog
MARCH 3, 2017
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied Defendants’ Petition for Rehearing En Banc in the case titled Markle Interests, L.L.C., The Blog/Web Site should not be used as a substitute for legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state regarding a particular matter. On February 13, 2017, the U.S.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
105 
Let's personalize your content