Remove category court-decisions
article thumbnail

Supreme Court Issues Decision Sharply Limiting Clean Water Act Jurisdiction over Wetlands

E2 Law Blog

Sometimes the most monumental Supreme Court decisions spring from the most modest facts. The Sacketts challenged the order, claiming that the wetlands are not jurisdictional “waters of the United States” within the meaning of the federal Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251-1389 (CWA). EPA , 598 U.S.

article thumbnail

Wetlands Protection Update

Smith Enviorment

Supreme Court decision reducing federal Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction over streams and wetlands. See State Law: Removing Wetlands from “Waters of the State”.) Federal Implementation of the decision in Sackett v. Most of those streams ultimately flow into permanent water bodies.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Post-Sackett Wetland Delineation Process Raises Questions

Ohio Environmental Law

Supreme Court in Sackett v. EPA which significantly reduced the number of wetlands that are federally protected under the Clean Water Act (CWA). Following the Supreme Court’s decision in SWANCC v. After the Sackett decision, based on information from U.S. Back on August 29, 2023, U.S.

article thumbnail

Bounty laws and citizen suits

Acoel

Supreme Court as it releases backlogged decisions prior to its June recess, the Fifth Circuit recently held back-to-back important oral arguments that haven’t drawn nearly the same amount of attention. The Texas Supreme Court said no , and the case faded from public view soon afterward when the U.S. Supreme Court reversed Roe v.

Law 52
article thumbnail

N.C. Water Quality Legislation (2023)

Smith Enviorment

This post covers the most significant legislation affecting state water quality protections: AQUACULTURE PERMITTING Replace the existing NPDES General Permit for aquaculture operations. The Clean Water Act requires a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit for any release of waste to surface waters.

2023 52
article thumbnail

Remedying Agency Misconduct

Vermont Law

These comments expressed major concerns that the permit MPCA planned to issue to PolyMet did not comply with the Clean Water Act. [2]. The concealment warranted a transfer to Minnesota District Court to review the MPCA’s permitting process and decision. [3]. A sort of “common law,” if you will.

article thumbnail

Pipeline Decisions Do Not Spell Doom for Transmission

Law Columbia

However, as explained below, siting decisions for pipelines and transmission lines are governed by different laws, and while both are subject to environmental review, their environmental impacts are not comparable. The recent pipeline decisions turned mostly on water quality concerns that are specific to oil and gas projects.