category court-decisions 2006 Related Topics 
E2 Law Blog
MAY 26, 2023
Sometimes the most monumental Supreme Court decisions spring from the most modest facts. Thus began nearly two decades of litigation, culminating in the Supreme Court’s May 25, 2023 decision in Sackett v. The Court next examines state dredge and fill permitting authority under Section 404(g) of the CWA, 33 U.S.C.
CEQA Developments
FEBRUARY 26, 2024
In an important published opinion filed February 16, 2024, the Fourth District Court of Appeal (Div. In an important published opinion filed February 16, 2024, the Fourth District Court of Appeal (Div. The Court of Appeal reversed. Hilltop Group, Inc., County of San Diego, et al. 2024) Cal.App.5th. Hilltop Group appealed.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
CEQA Developments
MAY 2, 2023
On April 7, 2023, the Third District Court of Appeal filed a lengthy published opinion – the latest installment in one of the longer ongoing CEQA battles in recent memory – affirming a judgment finding an EIR for the Federal relicensing of Oroville Dam and related hydropower facilities legally adequate. of Water Resources (2023) Cal.App.5th.
Law Columbia
JULY 6, 2017
Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the U.S. Circuit also rejected EPA’s argument that the court did not have authority to review stays issued under Section 307(d)(7)(D) of the Clean Air Act. The court therefore found that the stay was unauthorized and vacated it. FEATURED CASE. A divided D.C.
Law Columbia
FEBRUARY 12, 2024
A civil law breakthrough came in 2021, with the ruling of a Dutch court against Shell. In Smith v Fonterra , decided by New Zealand’s Supreme Court this week, we have perhaps the biggest common law breakthrough. New Zealand’s Court of Appeal, however, struck out all three claims, meaning that Smith would not receive his day in court.
CEQA Developments
DECEMBER 7, 2022
In an opinion filed November 18, and later ordered published on December 5, 2002, the First District Court of Appeal (Div. The neighborhood association (SINA) sued, challenging the City’s CEQA exemption determinations and the project’s general plan and planning code consistency; the trial court denied its writ petition and SINA appealed.
CEQA Developments
OCTOBER 21, 2021
In a 53-page published opinion filed October 8, 2021, the Fourth District Court of Appeal mostly affirmed, but reversed in part, a judgment in a CEQA action challenging two sets of projects of the City of San Diego to underground overhead utility wires in several neighborhoods. The Court Of Appeal’s Opinion.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
52 
Let's personalize your content